TV-PGNovember 9, 2004: The official scores are in, and the System X supercomputer slides down to seventh place. Meanwhile, Merrill Lynch just can't stop gushing about how great Apple is (we blame the drugs), and while Steve Jobs was named "Visionary of the Year," he still might be frowning over what won "Digital Music Innovation of the Year"...
But First, A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 
Sliding, But Only A Little (11/9/04)
SceneLink
 

The official results are in, folks, and it looks like we were right: faithful viewer Larry informs us that the official November TOP500 list of the world's fastest supercomputers is now available, and Virginia Tech's all-Mac-based System X has indeed slipped a few rungs down the ladder. You probably recall that when the cluster debuted, it blew minds from here to Neptune by somehow ranking as the third-fastest supercomputer on the planet despite having been built entirely from off-the-shelf Macs and bolted together by student volunteers at a total cost of roughly $5 million in cash and pizza. Well, it's a year later, and System X has been upgraded from 1,100 dual 2.0 GHz Power Mac G5s to 1,100 custom-built dual 2.3 GHz Xserves, boosting its performance by 19 percent-- but the advent of several new high-powered supercomputers still bumped it down to seventh place.

So, as Mac users, is it time to bow our heads in shame? Hardly. Seventh place is a darn impressive rank for such an inexpensive system, especially one that's listed as "self-made"; the next-highest-ranked "self-made" system on the list is at the University of Toronto, and it's way down there at number 201. Remember, too, that System X is running Mac OS X (well, maybe Mac OS X Server, since the upgrade to Xserves), so it's probably the fastest supercomputer running a mass-market commercial operating system instead of Linux or some proprietary supercomputer-only thingy. There's only one x86-based system ranked higher (the Thunder cluster at Lawrence Livermore), and if it's running Windows we'll eat our hats. (Gee, what tipped us off-- the penguin on Thunder's home page or the fact that it's hosted at the "Linux@Livermore" site?)

And what about sheer number of processors? As faithful viewer EJC points out, System X has only 2,200 chips-- the fewest processors of any supercomputer in the top ten, and barely a quarter of the 8,192 in use by the cluster that beat it out for sixth place. So there's still plenty to feel good about, Mac-based-supercomputing-wise. Meanwhile, let's expand the scope of the warm fuzzies vibe a little and consider how much kiester the PowerPC is kicking in the supercomputer world right now: in addition to powering the top-ranked system (which is currently in the lead by nearly 20 teraflops), the PowerPC runs four of the top ten systems-- five if you count the POWER4+, which is a close relative. In contrast, there are only two Intel-based entries in the top ten, at fifth and tenth. Ha! Losers.

That said, we're still a little bummed to see System X slide out of the top five, thus forfeiting its parking space on the TOP500 home page. But at least it's still a top ten supercomputer made entirely out of Macs-- and that snooty Earth Simulator finally got taken down a peg or two as well. (Okay, two.) Guess poor lil' NEC couldn't get that SX-8 up and running in time, hmmm?