TV-PGFebruary 13, 1998: Sexy new Powerbooks are preparing to slink into the laptop market and rule the roost. Meanwhile, Senator Hatch prepares a technological catfight between Gates, McNealy, and Barksdale, but Steve Jobs isn't invited. And the Info Vacuum surrounding Cupertino continues to, er, suck...
But First, A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 
Powerful Powerbooks (2/13/98)
SceneLink
 

If you're as big a fan of Apple's Powerbooks as we are, you've probably been following the ongoing story about Apple's new high-end "Wall Street" line at sites like O'Grady's PowerPage. But even if you haven't, you'll hear all about these new beauties soon enough; a recent CNET article signals the advent of the "mainstream" press that will cover the next generation of Apple laptops.

According to CNET, all of the new Powerbooks will be based on the same logic board when they are unveiled this spring. The processors on those boards will all be G3's, of course, ranging from 233 MHz to a blistering 292 MHz. Screens will vary at different price points, but the top of the line will sport a 14.1-inch active-matrix display. And rumors of the DVD-ROM drive option are apparently true. In addition, the PowerPage notes that the new cases are only about as thick as the sleek Duos, and the industrial design is "very curvy, black, and quite unlike any Powerbook to date." Oooh, we're getting, er, excited. Sure is nice to hear that Apple's commitment to innovative and interesting laptops hasn't changed.

Another thing sure hasn't changed, either-- the premium one must pay for speedy portability. The highest-end Wall Street model will carry a sticker price hovering around $6300. While you recover from your aneurysm, you can convalesce quietly, secure in the fact that the 233 MHz model (with a modest 12.1-inch passive-matrix screen) will only put a $2500-size dent in your wallet. Good thing, too, given how much the hospital bill's going to run you...

 
SceneLink (447)
Lost in the Mail? (2/13/98)
SceneLink
 

In a snub that will echo throughout the ages (or at least until we get distracted by a bright, shiny object), Republican Senator Orrin Hatch has neglected to invite Steve Jobs to his committee on competition and the Internet. The splendiforous AppleLinks points us to a Reuters story that shows Hatch inviting Bill Gates of Microsoft, Scott McNealy of Sun, and Jim Barksdale of Netscape.

Of course, putting those three in a room together sounds like a deliciously dangerous proposal. McNealy's personal hobby is publicly lambasting Gates and Microsoft, and of course there's the tiny issue of the Microsoft-Sun lawsuit involving the corruption of the Java standard. And the third side of this hate triangle is Barksdale, whose company is widely rumored to be ripe for a buyout following a tremendously poor quarter after Microsoft's "interesting" competitive practices stole market share from Netscape so quickly its personified head spun like a top. Catfight, anyone? We bet it's going to make the Jerry Springer show look like Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood. So how come no Steve Jobs, who could act as a referee, or least provide sparkling color commentary?

Poor Steve... we can just imagine him sitting at home, heartbroken at not being invited to the party. Just when we thought we had plenty of reasons to dislike Senator Hatch, the generous man's gone and given us another. Whatta sweet guy. Happy Valentine's Day, Orrin. Smoochies!

 
SceneLink (448)
No Comment at This Time (2/13/98)
SceneLink
 

You just have to love the informational vacuum surrounding Apple these days, which is so strong it's just gotta be an Oreck. Whenever any "early news" sneaks out of Cupertino, Apple's incredibly efficient official naysayers immediately go on record to suck the data right back inside the company walls. For instace, just days after the net was ablaze with reports that Apple would name a new CEO within four to six weeks, Apple officially denied those rumors, according to a Newsbytes article.

It's perhaps a disservice to call the four-to-six weeks timeframe a "rumor," though, since it came straight from the mouth of the guy at Apple's recruiting firm heading up the search. Or, rather, the guy who used to be heading up the search, if Apple's as displeased as they seem about his willingness to talk to the press. Nevertheless, an official Apple spokesperson denies that the search has been narrowed to four or five candidates, and states succinctly that there is "nothing new to report."

Oh, well. As far as AtAT's concerned, you can take your time, Apple; we're plenty happy with Steve in the driver's seat. At least with him, the show's never boring.

 
SceneLink (449)
← Previous Episode
Next Episode →
Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).