Choking on Java (9/11/98)
SceneLink
 

With all the activity heating up over the impending "Redmond Justice" season premiere (currently scheduled for September 23rd, though that could certainly change, given Microsoft's latest "let's subpoena several thousand documents from several really huge companies and only give them a one-week deadline" gambit), another lesser courtroom drama may have dropped somewhat from the public eye. Yes, the viewing public has a woefully short memory, and so the Nielsen ratings have dropped significantly on Sun's lawsuit against the Redmond Giant. But to be fair, there hasn't been a lot of activity in the case to hold the public's interest...

Think back hard; at the beginning of last year's television season, Sun sued Microsoft for violating its Java license, citing Microsoft's attempt to spike the brew with a decidedly Windows-flavored shot of code. Coming back to you now? Sun wanted Microsoft either to use true cross-platform Java as specified, or remove the "Java-compatible" logo from its non-compliant products. Once the suit was filed, it seemed that nothing exciting happened for months-- it was just one more legal battle to toss on the table for Microsoft's army of lawyers to tackle. But the slow wheels of justice crank inevitably onward, and now, just eleven months later, oral arguments in the case have been completed. While details are sketchy because the hearings were closed to the public (lots of juicy trade secrets were getting bounced around in there), a Computer Reseller News article quotes Sun's lawyer as saying that the arguments "went extremely well for Sun."

Of course, we've yet to see a lawyer be quoted as saying that a hearing went particularly badly for their clients; as you'd expect, Microsoft's lawyers also said they "performed well at the hearing." But still, it's an intriguing thought; while the whole world watches "Redmond Justice" because its outcome holds the potential to change Microsoft in a drastic manner, perhaps it's the Java case that will make the real difference; if Microsoft is somehow prevented from contaminating Java and the language fulfills its cross-platform, OS-agnostic promise, Windows may take a big hit, which is exactly what Microsoft is so afraid of. See, there's some drama there-- it's a shame that the case doesn't have a better publicist, no?

 
SceneLink (1006)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 9/11/98 episode:

September 11, 1998: Adobe denies rumors that it's leaving Apple for an exclusive affair with Microsoft. Meanwhile, Sun claims a victory in its battle with Microsoft over the heart and soul of Java, and a faithful viewer speculates on just how far Bill Gates' influence has reached...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 1005: Lies and Damn Lies (9/11/98)   And here we thought we'd all moved past the stage of listening to rumors that big developers are abandoning the Mac platform in droves. Ever since Intuit gave up on the Mac last April (true!) and then quickly reversed its stance not one week later (after having been given a behind-the-scenes glimpse of the top secret iMac), we figured that would be the last "jumping ship" story we'd hear for a while...

  • 1007: Seeing Starrs (9/11/98)   Ladies and gentlemen, we at AtAT are humbled by a paranoia far richer and more fertile than ours. At this point we step aside and turn the episode over to Russell Swan, a longtime faithful viewer whose nose for conspiracy is unparalleled: ÒHow could you have missed the big story?Ó...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1285 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).