The Skeptical Judge (1/24/99)
SceneLink
 

And speaking of long, bitter struggles, what struggle has been longer or more bitter than "Redmond Justice"? (Well, okay, lots of them-- but we're going to talk about the trial anyway.) Calculating purely based on number of witnesses processed, the trial is only about 54% complete, and most viewers place the government squarely in the lead so far. What makes that significant is that the latest witness, MIT economist Richard Schmalensee (Schmalensee... Schmalensee... We are never going to get tired of saying that name!) is the first witness that is on Microsoft's side. Or, at least, he's supposed to be, but his testimony doesn't seem to be helping the Redmond cause very much. Whereas we expected to see the tide start to turn once Microsoft started calling its own witnesses, instead we see Judge Jackson acting visibly skeptical of everything Schmalensee says.

According to an Interactive Week article, the judge directly questioned Schmalensee on three separate occasions in one day last week. Schmalensee's stance, as many of you are aware, is that Microsoft does not hold a monopoly, and therefore all antitrust charges are invalid. First, Judge Jackson was somewhat incredulous as to Schmalensee's apparent opinion that "the ability of affect distribution is no index of monopoly power." Later on, when Schmalensee suggested that the judge ignore that whole "Microsoft threatened to kill Mac Office unless Apple switched to Internet Explorer instead of Netscape" thing, claiming that such deals "are part of normal business practice," the judge countered with the observation that his argument only held water if Microsoft didn't hold monopoly power-- which has yet to be proven. Overall, Schmalensee didn't seem to impress anyone.

So Microsoft's first witness pretty much tanked, and both the judge and the Redmond legal team seem ready to write him off. Not to worry; Microsoft's got eleven more witnesses with which to build their case, and we're sure they'll provide plenty of entertainment in the coming months. By the way, to the industry watchers who predicted that the case would be over by the end of February: since the progress bar's only at 54% in late January, perhaps you'd care to change your estimates now?

 
SceneLink (1291)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 1/24/99 episode:

January 24, 1999: The iMac's quintessential simplicity will remain throughout its upcoming incarnations. Meanwhile, Apple's dollar-per-port FireWire license has industry players trying to bypass Apple's patents entirely, and Microsoft's first "Redmond Justice" witness fails to impress...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 1289: So Close, And Yet So Far (1/24/99)   The iMac is a great Macintosh-- let's not beat around the bush, here. It represents a paradigm shift for the whole computer industry by presenting a low-cost option to consumers who value simplicity and style...

  • 1290: Pay Per Port? Piffle! (1/24/99)   Oh, boy-- Apple's got the whole computer industry in a teeth-gnashing tizzy, again. This time the brouhaha is over FireWire, Apple's keen new high-speed peripheral expansion bus that makes adding hard drives simple-- you just plug them in...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).