Time Keeps On Slipping (1/25/99)
|
|
| |
Is it just us, or is anyone else out there tired of waiting for QuickTime 4.0? (And we personally don't even need it!) It seems like it's been "just around the corner" for half a year now-- or, at least, the most important feature of QuickTime 4.0 has, at any rate. We're talking about streaming video, the technology that will bring QuickTime into the same league as RealVideo and Microsoft's NetShow. QuickTime is great, but if you want to use it to broadcast live video over a network, you're pretty much out of luck-- and that fact had led some very large and important web sites to ditch their QuickTime content altogether. After all, why support multiple formats?
So Apple has been promising streaming capability for QuickTime for a long time now. Heck, Steve Jobs even demonstrated the technology earlier last year, by sticking his live face into the middle of a Microsoft Word document. Streaming QuickTime looks nifty, and it offers a couple of vast advantages over its competitors. First of all, it's still QuickTime, so any application that can show a QuickTime movie can also show a live broadcast-- no extra work for applications developers. And secondly, Apple's reportedly making the server technology open-source, so that anybody can throw together his or her own broadcasting server product. You'd think with those advantages, QuickTime should really be able to clean up in the streaming media market. Unfortunately, it's not around to compete, having missed its most recent anticipated ship date of the last Macworld Expo. The last we'd heard, QuickTime 4 would finally make an appearance in February.
Or maybe not. According to Apple Insider, after missing its last ship date, QuickTime 4 has been downgraded on the Hurry Scale. While a February release still looks likely, their sources claim that it may not see the light of day until as late as the National Association of Broadcasters conference in April. Granted, that would be a great event at which to take the wraps off of the new technology, but we wonder at what point the people who count might just say, "too little, too late." QuickTime 4 sounds like it'll be Insanely Great, but it may also be labeled Insanely Late.
| |
| |
|
SceneLink (1294)
| |
|
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors |
| | |
|
| |
|
| | The above scene was taken from the 1/25/99 episode: January 25, 1999: Apple sends HAL 9000 into the Super Bowl fray. Meanwhile, Steve may not be Man of the Year, but his iMac offspring grabs a similar distinction, and QuickTime 4.0 is still nowhere to be found...
Other scenes from that episode: 1292: A Hail Mary Play (1/25/99) Fill the snack bowls and load up your beverage helmet-- Apple's back in the Super Bowl. Or, at least, they're once again advertising during the Super Bowl (though we bet if you put Steve Jobs on the field, Mr. Reality Distortion Field would be able to persuade the other team that it was in their best interests to throw the game)... 1293: Like Father, Like Son (1/25/99) So Steve Jobs didn't get named Time's Man of the Year, despite the campaign to push him up in the magazine's web site polls. Really, is anyone surprised? If the online poll were anything other than a cheap and effective ploy to pull more traffic to their site, then the Man of the Year would probably be a martyr, a wrestler, or Hank, the Angry Drunken Dwarf...
Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast... | | |
|
|