Crying for Attention (2/8/99)
SceneLink
 

Okay, we've tried really hard to stay open-minded about this whole Imatec lawsuit, but it just gets harder and harder to take that company seriously. Imatec, as you almost certainly already know, is suing Apple for over a billion dollars, claiming that our favorite computer company willfully infringed upon three Imatec patents when they came up with their ColorSync color management technology. While Apple has kept characteristically quiet about the lawsuit ("We don't comment on pending litigation, but we feel that the case has no merit"), Imatec seems to be treating the whole thing as nothing but a public relations stunt. Take, for example, their practice of issuing press releases every time anything happens in the lawsuit-- or even when nothing happens, for that matter-- just to keep the case visible in the press. The most recent press release is even more an exercise in grabbing eyeballs, as Imatec CEO Hanoch Shalit announces that he's been interviewed by stock-line.com-- and, of course, it mentions the lawsuit.

The ten-minute phone-in RealAudio interview started off with Dr. Shalit reading the numbers and names of his three patents, and it didn't take him long to mention the Apple suit. Isn't it interesting that Dr. Shalit announced in an interview targeted at investors that his $3 million "developmental stage" company stood to gain as much as $3.3 billion in they win the Apple suit? We're sure that must look good to the investors. In fact, we seriously doubt that the interview would ever have happened at all if Imatec didn't have the Apple lawsuit as a carrot on a stick for the media. We try really hard to see Imatec's Shalit as potentially being the little guy who got stepped on by Big Bad Apple, but his constant begging for media coverage frankly smacks of blackmail tactics and an attempt to raise interest in his company's stock. Isn't it ironic that the link to Imatec's stock quote in the press release yields a "symbol not found" error?

Remember, based on what we've heard, this seems to be a company that has been busted before for selling stock without registering with the state of New York. This seems to be a $3 million company that has never had any income. This seems to be a $3 million company that is suing one of the most media-visible computer companies in existence for $1.1 billion, with the possibility of treble damages. This seems to be a company that has been associated with an investment bank that got shut down for fraud. And, as far as we can tell, this seems to be a company that seems to consist of little more than one guy-- this Shalit character, who as "Chairman/President/CEO/Secretary" (yes, he's really listed that way in the company profile, which at least lists a Dian Griesel as the company contact person) keeps issuing his company's press releases. How can we possibly see this lawsuit as anything but a long-shot attempt to win a few billion dollars, a slightly-more-likely chance to obtain a cash settlement from Apple just to go away, and at the very least a way to attract media attention in the hopes of inflating Imatec's stock price?

 
SceneLink (1326)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 2/8/99 episode:

February 8, 1999: The guy who runs Imatec just keeps issuing press releases about his billion-dollar Apple lawsuit. Meanwhile, Mac OS Rumors posts their predictions for Apple in 1999, and even Microsoft's staunchest supporters are beginning to write off the antitrust case as a lost cause...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 1327: The Truth Is Still Out There (2/8/99)   Wanna know what the future holds for Apple? You could always ask your Magic 8-Ball, but personally, we've found that method to be sadly unreliable. The guy who ran the Psychic Friends Network went bankrupt a year ago-- so apparently he's not all that psychic after all...

  • 1328: All Downhill From Here (2/8/99)   It's always a tricky thing when a TV show changes its focus. For instance, to take an example near and dear to our hearts, The X-Files has morphed a little this season, following their relocation from Vancouver to Hollywood and the blockbuster movie released last summer; several fans now refer to the show as "X-Files Lite," "The X-Files Comedy Hour," "Will Scully and Mulder Ever Kiss," etc...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1316 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2025 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).