Need a Warm-Up? (2/15/99)
SceneLink
 

There's nothing like a big, steaming hot cup of java to clear away the cobwebs and get you started in the morning, right? Except that when it comes to Java on the Macintosh, we've long suspected that the software merchants had sold us decaf instead. Back when Java was new and exciting, Netscape supported Sun's write-once-run-anywhere cross-platform programming language in the PC and Unix versions of its web browser, but it was nowhere to be found in the Mac version. And once we finally did get Java running on the Mac, it didn't so much run as, well, crawl. We remember how excited we were when the first Java-enabled version of Mac Netscape was released; we fired up the browser, surfed to a Java-enhanced site-- and promptly watched the entire system slow to a sloth's pace all for the sake of an animated banner that, frankly, would have been more appropriate as an animated GIF anyway. This is what all the hype was about?

And while both the real-world uses of Java and the performance of Java on the Mac may have advanced over the last few years, one thing has always been more or less true: Java performance on the Mac has, to put it in the nicest possible light, sucked. With no fewer than three widely-available Java Virtual Machines for the Mac-- Netscape's, Microsoft's, and Apple's own-- running a standard applet in the fastest of the three makes a G3 feel like an '030, while a lowly Pentium running Windows hardly breaks a sweat. That's not exactly a demonstration that shows the blistering performance of the PowerPC chip. And these days the number of JVM's is dropping quickly; Netscape announced that they were ceasing development of their own implementation of Java for their Navigator web browser, and more recently Microsoft said they were jettisoning Mac Java as well. That leaves Apple's Mac OS Runtime for Java. And that might not be a particularly enviable situation, if not for the fact that Apple just issued a press release announcing that MRJ 2.1 is now available for free download.

Due to the inclusion of Symantec's Just-In-Time compiler, version 2.1 of Apple's JVM is up to five times faster than the previous release, if Apple's marketingspeak can be believed; it's apparently designed to run full-scale Java applications (not just applets) at optimum speeds. In addition, MRJ 2.1 also complies with version 1.1.6 of Sun's JDK spec, and supports both AppleScript and QuickTime. If you want to spruce up Java on your Mac, head on over to the MRJ 2.1 web page and start downloading; this may just mark the beginning of serious Java support on the Mac, and it's a big step towards Steve Jobs' promise to make the Macintosh the best Java platform hands down. Now all we need is a version of Navigator that will use Apple's JVM instead of Netscape's decidedly anemic version. (Yes, we know that Internet Explorer will let us use the MRJ virtual machine, but Navigator is our "browser of choice.")

 
SceneLink (1341)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 2/15/99 episode:

February 15, 1999: Java on the Mac gets a warming up as Apple pours out Mac OS Runtime for Java 2.1. Meanwhile, the new blue-and-white G3's actually beat out dual-processor Pentium II systems in a Photoshop showdown, and the upcoming consumer portable might include handwriting recognition after all...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 1342: Bet on the Long Shot (2/15/99)   Speaking of PowerPC versus Pentium speeds (and we sort of were), we've long wondered how true Apple's G3 performance claims are. That whole "up to twice as fast" thing is based on a single benchmark-- the BYTEmark, which some people dismiss as an inaccurate test of relative processor speeds...

  • 1343: The Magic Touch (2/15/99)   Have you noticed that the rumored feature sets for upcoming Apple products always seem to shrink as the ship date gets closer? Take, for example, the P1-- the first product expected to fill in the missing "consumer portable" quadrant of Apple's product strategy when it finally surfaces sometime within the next few months...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1312 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2025 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).