It's Good To Be Back (6/1/99)
SceneLink
 

Ahhhh... Feel that? It's like a cool breeze on a hot summer day-- brought to you courtesy of "Redmond Justice." That's right, the drama's back in the swing of things, and just because the trial resumed with the rebuttal testimony of an economist is no reason to think that the proceedings weren't interesting. Franklin Fisher, a professor of economy at MIT, took the stand to counter the earlier testimony of Richard Schmalensee-- another MIT economist. (Things must be tense around the faculty water cooler at the Sloan School of Management, hmmm?)

If you think way back, you might recall that Schmalensee's argument was that Microsoft doesn't hold an operating system monopoly, because there's no operating system market to monopolize. According to an Inter@ctive Week Online article, though, Fisher maintained that Schmalensee's points were "confused," "muddled," and "simply wrong." (Ouch! Take it outside, fellas.) Not only is there an operating system market (since the vast majority of computers sold are PC's), he claims, but Microsoft has clearly engaged in behavior designed to kill competition that might threaten its place as king of the hill. The biggest example is Microsoft's spending of "hundreds of millions of dollars" to develop Internet Explorer, which it then gave away for free in an obvious attempt to thwart competitors like Netscape and Sun. Since IE couldn't generate revenue by such a plan, its only purpose could be to eliminate competitors from the marketplace.

So it's only the first day back, and the sparks are already flying on "Redmond Justice." You just have to love a show on which an economist sums up Microsoft's defense so succinctly: "They don't have monopoly power now because someone might come out and compete with them." So now we have to wait for Schmalensee to take the stand to rebut Fisher's testimony. Stay tuned, because that's scheduled for later in the month. Perhaps we'll get more gems from him like the one about how Microsoft "record[s] operating system sales by hand on sheets of paper." Ain't life grand?

 
SceneLink (1573)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 6/1/99 episode:

June 1, 1999: Yet another analyst has jumped on the Apple bandwagon. Meanwhile, CompUSA makes you an offer you can't refuse, and "Redmond Justice" resumes transmission with a battle of dueling economists...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 1571: Another One On Board (6/1/99)   See? Wall Street may take a while to catch on, but they're finally taking notice of Apple. Yet another analyst has raised his rating on Apple's stock; this time it's Richard Gardner of Salomon Smith Barney, who, according to a Mac Observer article, just upped his "neutral" rating to a "buy," citing strong iMac sales and other signs of health and growth...

  • 1572: Don't Delay-- Call Now (6/1/99)   So we were so fixated on checking last Sunday's Sears circular to see how they'd handle the debut of the iMac in their 800 stores (they, uh, didn't-- but we're told the official introduction has been pushed forward 'til next week) that we completely forgot to check the CompUSA circular...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).