Mistakes Were Made. (11/21/99)
SceneLink
 

There are basically only two possibilities when it comes to MSNBC's recent anti-Mac web hijinx. The first is that MSNBC's webmasters are simply completely incompetent and should be replaced by a cow and a duck; the farm animals wouldn't do a better job (probably), but at least they'd accept a much lower salary. The second possibility here is that the "MS" part of MSNBC is up to the usual kinds of slimy behavior that put Redmond on the map as the Sleazy Business Tricks Capital of the World. Remember the recent MSNBC poll asking for opinions on the "Redmond Justice" trial? At first, only Internet Explorer users could vote. And even after users complained and MSNBC corrected the "mistake" to allow Netscape users to vote as well, Mac users of any browser were still locked out. What a fun way to skew an opinion poll, right?

So now here's the latest "mistake" made by the MSNBC webdorks: according to a Mac Observer article, Mac users are prevented from viewing any video on the site. MSNBC doesn't offer QuickTime or RealVideo versions of its video content-- it's Windows Media Player or nothing. That's not terribly surprising, given the company's Microsoft ties. But what's particularly interesting is that Mac browsers attempting to view the Media Player content find themselves locked out with a curt message stating that "Windows Media Player for Macintosh is not currently available." The Javascript code on the page actually checks to see if you're using a Mac, and if you are, it doesn't give you the link to the video files. And the strangest thing of all, here, is that there is a version of Windows Media Player for the Mac, although it's "only" a beta version. (As if all Microsoft software isn't a beta version...) Loading MSNBC video files on a Mac running Windows Media Player reportedly works fine, once you work around the "get lost" code that MSNBC put up.

Of course, just as when the poll "mistake" was made public, MSNBC has stated that everything will be fixed by Monday. According to MacNN, some MSNBC spokesperson says that "the block put on Mac browsers because of Media Player was a simple programming error." Yeah, a "simple programming error" that explicitly checks for the string "mac" in the browser identification data and then blocks the user: "Whoops, I accidentally leaned on the keyboard and constructed a working if-then routine, complete with a terse notification that Mac users are screwed. Sorry about that." Please. At best it was ignorance of Mac Media Player's existence. At worst it was a deliberate attempt to make Mac users think their computers can't handle Internet video as well as Wintel systems can. But there's no way the Mac block was an actual programming error. That's like calling Judge Jackson's findings of fact a "typo." (Whoops, we hope we didn't just give Microsoft's lawyers any ideas.)

 
SceneLink (1925)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 11/21/99 episode:

November 21, 1999: Uncle Steve's obsession with virtual brushed metal isn't going down so well with the Mac community. Meanwhile, MSNBC continues to discriminate against Mac web surfers; this time the company's blocked access to all of their video content. And in "Redmond Justice" news, we've got a new judge joining the cast to act as a mediator during settlement talks. Prepare for ensuing wackiness...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 1924: And What's THIS Do? (11/21/99)   There's lots to like about Apple these days: a healthy financial footing, a terrific product line, a nice relationship with the press, etc. But Apple just wouldn't be Apple without the occasional dramatic boneheaded misstep to keep things interesting...

  • 1926: Three's Company (11/21/99)   Ooooh, that darn Judge Jackson just makes us so mad sometimes. It's been obvious all along that he's pushing hard for a settlement in the "Redmond Justice" case, so he won't have to issue an actual verdict...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).