Settle Down, Children (2/21/00)
SceneLink
 

Finally! "Redmond Justice" vaults back into action, as Microsoft's legal team and the government lawyers take a break from their interminable off-camera settlement negotiations to trudge back into court one last time. On Tuesday, both sides will make their final oral arguments to Judge Jackson, before that stalwart champion of justice issues his verdict. If there was ever a "home stretch" in this marathon case, this would appear to be it-- and things still aren't looking good for Microsoft's legal team, known to insiders as "the punching bags." Remembers, Jackson's findings of fact ripped their arguments to shreds, and yet word has it that settlement talks are still going nowhere.

Of course, when you consider what would happen if Microsoft loses, perhaps it's not all that hard to understand why they haven't settled despite overwhelming odds. As a Nando Media article puts it, an actual verdict of any kind (instead of a settlement) would result in "an agonizingly slow appeals battle that could wind through the federal courts for years longer." Catching on yet? There's no such thing as bad publicity, and we figure that Microsoft's developed a taste for the limelight. If the company loses, the glacial appeals process will guarantee that "Redmond Justice" will run for many more years to come, whereas a settlement would result in one big media blitz, followed by dead air. If you were the star of a hit courtroom drama, which fate would you prefer?

Jackson, meanwhile, wants out, but nothing he can do seems to spur the two parties any closer to an agreement. You recall how he assigned Judge Posner to mediate the settlement talks? Well, Jackson declared that he was willing to postpone Tuesday's arguments if Posner "seems to think that more time is needed." Nope; apparently talks are at enough of a standstill that extra time isn't going to do any good, much to Jackson's chagrin. So the final arguments will proceed as planned, and eventually Jackson's going to have to issue a verdict. Then get ready for the spin-off: "Redmond Justice: The Appeal."

 
SceneLink (2109)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 2/21/00 episode:

February 21, 2000: Arguments over whether or not Steve's jet is "recurring" are the latest fad around the financial water cooler. Meanwhile, Palm unveils its first color device while the alleged Apple-Palm PDA is still MIA, and "Redmond Justice" convenes for final arguments; is Microsoft trying to lose?...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2107: Recurring Flightmares (2/21/00)   Geez, give someone an aircraft or two and they never let you live it down. It's been a month and a half since Apple's Board of Directors presented Steve with the gift that keeps on giving-- a Gulfstream V jet-- and that teensy token of appreciation is still making headlines...

  • 2108: Color Commentary (2/21/00)   So much for Apple's chance to be the first on the block with a color Palm OS device. As long expected, Palm finally unveiled the Palm IIIc, their premiere color handheld device. People who've been following the saga knew about the planned February introduction many moons ago, but there were those of us who held out hope that Apple's lab gnomes would still get their alleged Palm device out the door first...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1246 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).