Doh... James Doh. (5/1/00)
SceneLink
 

Espionage, indeed. If nothing else, that title certainly may explain how a rather high-quality QuickTime version of an otherwise never-before-seen Apple television commercial suddenly surfaced at AdCritic.com bearing the appropriate title of "Espionage," as first pointed out by faithful viewer Charles Gaba. Being the TV junkies that we are (we're working on a combination time dilation and caffeine delivery system to allow us to watch twenty-six hours a day), we at AtAT think we can safely say that this commercial has never graced the airwaves with its mysterious presence, and it certainly isn't available for download from Apple's site. So where did this oddball ad come from?

If you haven't seen it, "Espionage" is a sixty-second clip depicting a late-night arms deal in a foggy warehouse. A briefcase of money is exchanged for a set of keys to a van, when suddenly the cops show up to raid the place. A Kevlar-wearing police agent crowbars open a crate in the back of the van: "Hey, detective, is that a...?" "That's one of them supercomputers," the detective responds, as he gazes at the Graphite-and-Ice curves of the Power Mac G4 nestled in the crate. Stylistically, the ad seems like a car commercial, and there's more than a hint of "Matrix Chic" in effect-- the black-clad, short-haired brunette in shades, the sudden transitions between slo-mo and fast-forward, etc. Unsurprisingly, the brunette manages to drive off with the G4 by posing as a cop, and Apple's logo and the slogan "Think Different" spin against an all-black background.

So is this a legit Apple commercial that was never released, smuggled out of Cupertino in the back of a black van? Could be, but the evidence against such a scenario is pretty weighty. First of all, it's completely inconsistent with every other Apple commercial released in the past two years. (Black backgrounds? Never heard of such a thing.) For another thing, as faithful viewer Justin Reese noticed, the font used for the "Think Different" tag looks different: "the Apple Garamond looks a bit offish, all in all a bit fishy." And if you look at the listed credits for the piece, the director is one "James Doh." Real name? You decide; at least his first name isn't John. Personally, we're assuming that someone outside of Apple's ad agency crafted this quizzical little gem entirely on his or her own. In fact, we wouldn't be completely surprised to hear that this is a real commercial for a different product and that some enterprising young pixel-pusher did a great job of editing in the image of a G4 and dubbing a new voice track-- but that would be a pretty impressive feat. Then again, if the perpetrator used a G4 to pull it off, well, suddenly that possibility seems less unlikely, doesn't it?

Update: eagle-eyed faithful viewer Ivan Hooker notes that Apple never capitalizes the "d" in "Think different." So "Espionage" may be cool, but it's definitely not a real Apple commercial. Faithful viewer Eric Samsel notes the presence of a couple more (non-Apple) commercials at http://www.karlicious.com/. If Karl Larsen (the guy who made these) and friends aren't making commercials professionally, they should be...

 
SceneLink (2263)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 5/1/00 episode:

May 1, 2000: A new Apple commercial surfaces on the web-- or is it an Apple commercial? Meanwhile, rumors are swirling, hinting at dual- and quad-G4 Power Macs by WWDC, and Microsoft gets caught plotting Palm's overthrow nary a month after it ended its trial for illegally destroying Netscape...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2264: Armed And Dangerous (5/1/00)   You know, it's not totally inconceivable that the "Espionage" G4 commercial that popped up so mysteriously at AdCritic.com is actually part of a new look and feel for Apple commercials. Most of Apple's ads in recent years have been targeted squarely at consumers, with a high concentration of brightly-colored iMacs and iBooks whimsically dancing across unthreatening white backgrounds...

  • 2265: Compulsive Behavior (5/1/00)   Okay, lots of you (faithful viewer Renaldo Nehemiah having been the first) are writing in about how Palm was next on Microsoft's infamous hit list. If you haven't heard, in the government's filing last Friday calling for Microsoft's breakup, the Justice Department noted that, less than a month after the "Redmond Justice" trial ended, Bill Gates sent email to his staff "directing that Microsoft redesign its software to harm competitors" who make PDAs...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).