Foaming At The Mouth (5/8/00)
SceneLink
 

And speaking of the ILOVEYOU virus, given the sheer number of you who wrote in about it, we have to assume you've heard what our old friend Bill Gates said in this week's issue of Time Magazine, right? Faithful viewer Noah Daniels was the first to tip us off to Bill's latest... well, we're not quite sure how to describe it. If he were any other guy, we'd probably classify it as a "psychotic rant," but he's the richest man in the world (or thereabouts), so we believe the proper term to use is "eccentric viewpoint." Hey, this is America; having mountains of cash can offset any number of personal quirks and foibles, insanity being the least of them.

Anyway, as you pore through Bill's plea to avoid a Microsoft breakup, you may notice a few interesting concepts. For example, he claims that his company is working on a tablet PC, but "under the government's plan, ... Microsoft's tablet PC simply won't happen." Why? Because a breakup would put Microsoft's operating system developers in one company, and its applications developers in another. As we all know, it's impossible for a company to write applications unless it's also developing the operating system on which it's running, which is why the only applications software available for Windows is all written by Microsoft. Similarly, creating hardware that works with a particular operating system requires that the OS be developed alongside the hardware, which is why every Windows PC sold today is manufactured by Microsoft itself. It all makes sense, right? (If you ever find yourself face-to-face with Bill and he starts going on about this, don't make any sudden movements; just smile, nod, and back away slowly.)

But the really goofy stuff comes towards the end, when Bill predicts what The Register calls a "Love Bug apocalypse" if Microsoft is broken up. Bear with us for a second, here: his argument is that the best defense against virus writers is a "continually evolving" operating system; if Microsoft is broken up, there will be less "innovation" in the OS, and therefore virus authors like the ones who gave us ILOVEYOU will have a field day learning and exploiting the static holes in the system. We can only assume that Bill wrote this piece via voice dictation software, because it's tough to type while you're in a straitjacket and pumped full of Thorazine. (Believe us, we know.)

Meanwhile, conspiracy-minded folks realize there's more to this article than meets the eye. ILOVEYOU only hit, when, last Thursday? And mere days later, Bill's got an impeccably well-timed (if slightly foaming-at-the-mouth) article playing on people's Love Bug fears, saying that this sort of thing is exactly what we all can look forward to if Microsoft is split in two. Hmmm... has anyone checked Bill's bank records for large sums of money wired to the Phillipines in the last few months? Because the timing of this whole thing has us wondering whether Bill's talk of a viral armageddon is a prediction-- or a threat. How many virus writers do you suppose you could keep on retainer for fifty billion dollars?

 
SceneLink (2280)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 5/8/00 episode:

May 8, 2000: So are multiprocessor G4s on tap for next week? No one wants to say for sure. Meanwhile, CNN decides to show a Mac in its "Love Bug" coverage, despite that system's nigh-invulnerability as far as ILOVEYOU is concerned, and Bill Gates argues that if Microsoft is split up, ILOVEYOU is just the beginning-- coincidence?...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2278: Hedging One's Bets (5/8/00)   Boy, we'll say one thing for last January's Pismo No-Show debacle: it's sure made the prognosticators gunshy. Before that fun little disappointment, everybody with a web page and a Magic 8-Ball would blithely predict all manner of new product announcements and surprises, and then commit their prophecies to the virtual semipermanence of digital ink...

  • 2279: Everyone Loves Libel (5/8/00)   Sometimes we just have to wonder if the so-called "news" sites do any research at all. It's one thing when we at AtAT deliver information that's "accuracy-challenged," because we're not making any promises; heck, we've been known to make stuff up because it's funnier than the truth-- or because looking up the real facts would interfere with our strenuous Olympic training regimen...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).