Supreme Ratings Getter (6/20/00)
SceneLink
 

Summer reruns? We scoff at their futile attempts to bore us into submission; the new episodes of "Redmond Justice" are providing us with more than enough excitement in these summer months. The recent scrummage for control following Judge Jackson's breakup ruling was more intrigue than we could handle-- the government and the judge wanting to punt the case to the Supreme Court, and Microsoft trying to wrestle the case into the willing and friendly hands of the Appeals Court instead. And when the dust cleared? Stand back, because here come the Big Guys.

Yes, as faithful viewer Tony Misasi was first to point out, Judge Jackson has officially kicked the case upstairs; a Reuters article has more details. Microsoft must be fuming; the Appeals Court, after all, hasn't exactly been subtle about its pro-Redmond leanings. We imagine that the Supreme Court is far less likely to play Bill Gates's lap dog. But don't count the Appeals Court out just yet; the judge hit the ball to the Supreme Court, but the Supreme Court might whack the ball right back if it decides that the Appeals Court should hear the case first. Heck, as far as we know, the Supreme Court could conceivably decline to hear the case at all-- though, of course, that's not terribly likely.

And just when you were thinking that Judge Jackson's irredeemably grumpy, he goes and does something sweet. When he sent the case to the Supreme Court, he also agreed to suspend those conduct restrictions he imposed on Microsoft. The Redmond Giant is free to conduct business as it pleases until the appeal is resolved. Our guess is, since forcing Microsoft to operate within those conduct restrictions would likely have been impossible, he decided not to waste anyone's time with them. Of course, we have to admit we're a little suspicious to see the judge do something so nice; the other distinct possibility is that the judge is handing Microsoft just enough rope to hang itself. Without being forced to modify its business practices by an outside entity, odds are it'll be business as usual at Microsoft-- meaning that other "questionable" practices may well come to light even as the company tries to win its appeal. Too devious? Hey, not for prime time it isn't.

 
SceneLink (2370)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 6/20/00 episode:

June 20, 2000: Still more rumors about the iMac's inevitable revision start to surface. Meanwhile, a couple of viewers offer explanations of why Apple's having new Newton boxes printed, and Judge Jackson kicks the ball to the Supreme Court...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2368: The iMac Of The Future (6/20/00)   When you play the Apple prediction game, you have to decide just how far out on the limb you're willing to climb. Those who play it safe and stay lashed to the tree's trunk are content with sticking to the obvious and the general, stating, for example, that "the iMac will be revised at some point in the future."...

  • 2369: Business Diversification (6/20/00)   Who would have thought that yesterday's throwaway reference to the Newton's unlikely return would actually generate some discussion? We took a highly suspicious online claim-- somebody said that Apple was having new Newton boxes printed at his place of business-- and tacked it on to the long list of fun but deliriously sketchy tidbits that collectively make up the Apple Handheld Apocrypha...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1241 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).