Not The Fight We Hoped For (8/30/00)
SceneLink
 

You know, there's something else kind of interesting about Steve's Seybold keynote yesterday; despite the fact that Seybold's focus is on graphics professionals, there was a noticeable lack of news about graphics hardware for the Mac. Oh, sure, Steve made passing references to the "fast graphics" built in to every shipping professional Mac, but never once did he mention them by name-- there were no references to the ATI Rage 128 Pro in the Power Mac and Cube, nor was the word "Radeon" uttered even once.

Interpret that how you will. One possibility is that Steve didn't want to say that the Rage 128 Pro is used in current Macs because Apple plans on replacing them soon-- with the Radeon, which perhaps still isn't quite ready for an onstage demo. (Or maybe Steve's still miffed at ATI for wrecking his Expo surprises last month.) Even more intriguing is the possibility that ATI's on the way out completely, due to some combination of poor performance and an inability to keep corporate secrets; if you want to crawl way out on the Limb of Wild Speculation, you might even think that Steve's reluctance to mention ATI in public is due to a new OEM deal in the works with NVIDIA, who's been making baby steps into the Mac market lately. Or maybe it's 3dfx, instead, whose latest cards are available for the Mac and racking up huge points with users tired of ATI's mediocre performance and notoriously buggy drivers.

Oops-- hang on. Apparently the wonderful world of patent litigation might throw a wrench into the glorious dream of serious competition in the Mac graphics arena. According to Semiconductor Business News, NVIDIA has just sued 3dfx, alleging that the VSA-100 chip used in 3dfx's latest Voodoo4 and Voodoo5 cards infringes five NVIDIA patents. 3dfx's response? In a press release, the company states that "NVIDIA's filing of a suit is clearly an attempt to force a settlement of our existing patent infringement lawsuit against NVIDIA, and we believe [it] demonstrates a lack of confidence in their current defense."

Duelling lawsuits! What could be more fun? Well, except for maybe both NVIDIA and 3dfx not being distracted by lawsuits and instead channeling all their energy into fighting for Apple's lucrative OEM business by cranking out incredible new graphics cards for the Mac-- thus forcing ATI to get on the stick, too, and leading to a massive three-way no-holds-barred cage match (graphically speaking). Here's hoping those legal differences get settled quickly, because an injunction barring the further sale of Voodoo5 cards could really get unpleasant-- for 3dfx and graphics-hungry Mac users alike.

 
SceneLink (2517)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 8/30/00 episode:

August 30, 2000: There wasn't much substance to Steve's Seybold keynote, but at least we'll get the Mac OS X public beta in two weeks. Meanwhile, eyewitnesses and a complete transcript of the proceedings cast doubt on CNET's report of an alleged onstage PowerBook crash, and duelling lawsuits may cast a further pall on the current state of Mac graphics...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2515: Two Weeks? Hah! Too Easy (8/30/00)   Well, let's skip right over the told-ya-sos and try to ignore the wailing cries, the tearing of hair, and the gnashing of teeth for a moment, shall we? It's tough, we know, what with all those former optimists railing in disbelief over the sheer injustice of a Stevenote with no new gear...

  • 2516: To Freeze Or Not To Freeze (8/30/00)   "Pull a Gates": v. intr., to demonstrate new technology in front of a large audience only to see said demo fail; to crash and burn onstage. First usage circa April 1998, following a demonstration of Windows 98's support of the USB standard by Microsoft Chairman and CEO Bill Gates at Spring Comdex; upon connecting a USB scanner to the demo computer, the system crashed in front of thousands of viewers...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1246 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).