Why Settle For 17 Inches? (11/21/00)
SceneLink
 

Most people who have watched the iMac slide in the sales ratings over the course of the past year or so attribute its reduced popularity to a number of factors (seemingly low clock speed, no CD-R), but probably none more so than screen size. Simply put, some folks claim that a 15-inch screen just ain't cuttin' it anymore. Since even el cheapo PCs increasingly ship with 17-inch monitors these days (questionable though their quality may be), the fact that the iMac is still shipping with a teeny integrated 15-inch display is a definite black mark in many a shopper's "con" column. That's why there's been a sustained cry for a 17-inch iMac for probably longer than the iMac's been shipping in the first place.

Now, if you've been following this stuff, you know full well that rumors of a 17-inch iMac have been floating around for years. Before each and every Stevenote, the fabled system appears on at least one or two "long shot" new hardware prediction lists, and at a few of those events, its appearance was widely considered to be a dead certainty. But of course, the larger-screen iMac remains a mythical beast, with no hard evidence of its existence in sight. Until now.

First, the good news: the larger-screen iMac does exist, and you will be able to buy it in just over a week. Better still, its integrated display isn't a 17-incher. It's not even a 19-incher. Ready for this? The screen is a thirty-foot display (27.6-foot diagonal viewable image size). The bad news: there's only one of these iMacs currently available for sale, it's only available in Bondi Blue, and it's a two-story-tall inflatable display piece currently up for auction at eBay (thanks to faithful viewer Ben for the heads up). But the screen, people, the screen! Who cares if the thing doesn't actually work? Who cares if the display always says "Hello (Again)"? As long as you can have an iMac screen the size of Montana (if Montana were, say, roughly 375 square feet in size), life is good.

Be warned, though-- this puppy's 300 pounds, so if you bid, be prepared to shell out crazy ducats for shipping charges, unless you live within a four-hour drive of Winston-Salem, NC. At broadcast time, the bidding was up to $330 with over eight days to go, so we expect this thing to cost more than a real iMac when it's finally sold. Then again, with a screen that big, of course it'd cost a few bucks extra. Heck, we're considering bidding on it ourselves, seeing as a giant inflatable iMac would really dress up the back yard of the AtAT compound...

 
SceneLink (2692)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 11/21/00 episode:

November 21, 2000: Intel hits 1.5 GHz, but given the Pentium 4's real-world performance, the war's not over yet. Meanwhile, an iMac with a much larger screen surfaces on eBay, and a coalition of seven heavy-hitters targets Apple for a patent infringement lawsuit...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2691: A Treatment For MHz-Envy (11/21/00)   So is anybody tallying the official death toll now that Intel's lapped Motorola twice around the racetrack? Because we can only assume that being maxed out at 500 MHz (two processors notwithstanding) while the Pentium 4 is now allegedly shipping in 1.4 and 1.5 GHz flavors has driven at least a few of the long-suffering Mac faithful to untimely ends, either by their own hands or just by the sheer crushing shame of it all...

  • 2693: Mac DVD-ROM: Lawsuit Ho! (11/21/00)   Admit it: you miss the litigational hijinks of that jolly old Imatec ColorSync lawsuit. The thrill of the hunt, the smell of a frivolous lawsuit, a few billion bucks on the line, the constant inane Hanoch Shalit press releases.....

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1247 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).