Home: Where the $ Is (12/15/97)
SceneLink
 

Apple, under Steve Jobs' direction, announced last August that they would concentrate their efforts on the two markets in which the Mac truly excels: content creation, and education. Well, that's all well and good (provided something actually gets done about them someday-- where are the Pixel-Pusher specials, with high-powered graphics capability, super-fast disks, tons of RAM, and Photoshop/Pagemaker/Illustrator preinstalled? Or a low-cost education system with easily-replaceable components for simple lab maintenance? Or, for that matter, anything to demonstrate this so-called commitment to those core markets?).

But what about the home market? Apple is implying that it's conceding that ground to Microsoft/Intel, as if that war is already lost. But MacCentral doesn't think that's wise, citing the recent Dataquest figures that show personal computers in 43% of U.S. homes. According to Dataquest, a full "10% of U.S. households plan to buy computers in the next six months." When you think about it, that's a lot of potential income. So why would Apple shrink from competing in a market that, based on technical merits and common sense, should be an easy victory? After all, you'd think home users would want, first and foremost, a machine that works and is easy to use and maintain.

The biggest reason is not the lack of an Apple presence in retail, nor is it the Wintel marketing juggernaut's total dwarfing of any Apple advertising presence. And believe it or not, we don't think it's even the massive public perception that Apple is dead or dying. Apple is not going after the home market for the simple reason that the remaining 57% of U.S. homes are no way, no how going to pay over $2000 for a computer system. The people who want to spend that much on a computer have already bought; the remainder want sub-$1000 systems, and Apple doesn't have one. Should they have one? The profit margins on such boxes are razor-thin. Is it worth the effort, especially at a time when Apple must be so careful about allocating resources? Well, think of it this way: If Apple waits another six months to go after the consumer market, that 10% of U.S. households ready to buy will already have bought-- and they'll have bought Wintel.

 
SceneLink (271)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 12/15/97 episode:

December 15, 1997: (Sorry—this was before we started writing intro text for each episode!)

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 272: Microsoft's Appealing (12/15/97)   Despite their public contention that Judge Jackson's preliminary injunction (which temporarily prohibits them from forcing Wintel manufacturers to install Internet Explorer on all Windows 95 machines) doesn't worry them, Microsoft is appealing Jackson's injunction on the grounds that it "improperly expands the scope" of the Justice Department's antitrust action...

  • 273: Winblows is Live (12/15/97)   Remember www.microsnot.com? They may have been dethroned as the king of all Microsoft parody sites by www.winblows.com. Although this site is really just a great big ad for Palladium's upcoming CD-ROM-based parody called Microshaft Winblows 98, it's still a fun little romp...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).