DoJ Fights Back (12/17/97)
SceneLink
 

Not that anyone didn't expect it, but the Department of Justice is fighting Microsoft's current "compliance" with Judge Jackson's temporary injunction. As you saw in yesterday's episode, Microsoft's idea of not forcing vendors to ship IE on Windows 95 systems consists of giving them the additional "choices" of shipping either a non-bootable system, or one running a two-year-old OS with more bugs than a Watergate hotel room. Which amounts, of course, to the "I'm not touching her" defense, back when your mom threatened to whup you if you didn't stop bothering your kid sister; putting your fingers within half an inch of her face was technically compliant, but it most likely got you smacked anyway. It's that "letter but not spirit of the law" thing.

So, Techweb's got the details on the DoJ's latest volley in the ongoing battle, which involves filing papers in U.S. District Court claiming that Microsoft's strategy does not meet the terms of Jackson's injunction. This is the equivalent of your kid sister telling your mom that you're still bugging her. Its success or failure depended largely on how tired and/or edgy your mother was feeling just then-- a backfire scenario was always a risk, in which Mom told your sister to shut up and stop bothering her, or she'd turn the car around and take you both home right now. It'll be interesting to see what "Mom" Jackson's reaction will be.

The DoJ is asking for the judge to hold Microsoft in civil contempt for their "flagrant disregard of this court's lawful authority." There's still a chance that the much-hyped $1 million-a-day fine may still be imposed, if Jackson is capable of seeing through Microsoft's obvious flouting of his orders.

 
SceneLink (277)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 12/17/97 episode:

December 17, 1997: (Sorry—this was before we started writing intro text for each episode!)

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 278: What Pulled the Plug (12/17/97)   Okay, okay, we know we're beating a long-dead horse here, but we've got to address the November 10th announcement one last time. You all still remember, we're sure, that Apple originally planned for the circus to last for two and a half hours, when in fact it lasted only sixty minutes...

  • 279: Giving me a SEIZURE!! (12/17/97)   And in the "Unrelated But Too Goofy Not To Mention" file today, how 'bout that Japanese cartoon that sent some 560 viewers into convulsions while watching it? That's right-- a slew of folks who tuned into a particular episode of "Pocket Monster" apparently wound up writhing on their sitting-room floors with their eyes rolling back in their heads...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).