The iMac2: "I'll Be Back" (2/12/01)
SceneLink
 

Heads up, everyone; with new iMacs almost certain to strut their CD-burning stuff at next week's Macworld Expo, it's already time to start thinking about what the less immediate future holds for Apple's cuddly consumer desktop system. Next week's models aren't likely to be much more than the existing units with CD-RW drives, more RAM, bigger hard drives, faster processors and graphics, and maybe a new hue or two-- but with the same basic chassis and design. But will this be it? There's little argument that the iMac's look is getting old, so after next week's revision, will Apple try to counter a sagging personal computer market (and flagging iMac sales, to boot) by turning the iMac into something decidedly other?

Let's consider the possibilities for a minute. There's the long-rumored 17-inch iMac, whose advocates hope would counter the growing feeling that the iMac's existing 15-inch screen is just too small. There's also the "monitorless iMac" idea that's been kicked around so much, which would let customers pick their own screen size, while freeing up Apple's industrial design folks to play around with a smaller footprint. And then there's that ol' LCD iMac concept, which has long been proposed as a great way to revitalize the line into the Next Big Thing™. Which, if any, of these are in the cards when Apple decides to shake things up a bit?

Well, if you believe Mac OS Rumors (and notice, of course, that we said "if"), in the shorter term, the 17-incher's the best bet. Monitorless iMacs would do a lot to wreck the system's "there's no step three" ease-of-use reputation, so that's pretty much a no-go, and LCD panels are still way too pricey to slap into a consumer-priced iMac. So MOSR states that the next iMac will feature a "larger, high-resolution display" without specifying a size, though we can't see Apple using anything larger than 17 inches-- and smaller would, uh, sort of defeat the purpose.

But the larger-display iMac won't just be today's iMac on steroids. Rumor has it that Apple is moving the ports closer to the front of the unit, while peppering the enclosure with "a denser arrangement of cooling vents." Oh, and about that enclosure? Apparently Apple's recent move away from curves (the Cube, the PowerBook G4) is filtering down into realm of the once-cuddly iMac, as well; prototype future iMacs feature "a more angular shape," and some even have "a smattering of exposed metal surfaces" to create "a more futuristic, industrial look." Zounds! Shades of Good Terminator at the end of T2! Sounds like the iMac's time as "the cute computer" might well be drawing to a close.

 
SceneLink (2858)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 2/12/01 episode:

February 12, 2001: First the cell phones, and now the chips: Motorola calls for another 4000 layoffs. Meanwhile, several PowerBook orders have apparently been held up in customs in Alaska (blame the FDA), and Apple looks for a way to make the iMac new again...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2856: Motorola: Pink Slip Fever (2/12/01)   Isn't it funny how some things can be slightly shocking even as they're utterly unsurprising? For example, when faithful viewer Michael pointed us towards a Reuters article reporting that Motorola is planning to slash a whopping 4000 jobs from its semiconductor unit this year, we were indeed shocked by the sheer brutality of the act; those 4000 jobs account for a sizeable 12% of Motorola's semiconductor division, so this strategy qualifies less as "downsizing" and more as "amputation."...

  • 2857: They're Scaring The Moose (2/12/01)   Attention, all you still-waiting PowerBook G4 customers, who are probably feeling more than a little like characters in a Beckett play by now: we have good news and bad news. The good news is that many of your orders have shipped-- we repeat, your orders have shipped...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1242 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).