Might Crash, Won't Burn (3/21/01)
SceneLink
 

Three days and counting-- and wouldn't you know it? CNET continues to complain about Mac OS X's missing features well in advance of the product making it out the door. Not long ago, Those Of The Yellow Sidebar issued a gloomy report focusing on the operating system's 1.0 warts, such as incomplete support for hardware graphics acceleration, performance bottlenecks, crashing problems, and-- horror of horrors-- its inability to play DVD movies. Not that any of those issues should be dismissed as acceptable, but come on; can we at least wait until today's media briefing takes place before we jump down Apple's throat?

Evidently the answer is a deafening "no," at least as far as CNET is concerned; after milking the showstopper "no DVD movies" issue for all it was worth, those folks have moved onto bigger and better feature omissions-- such as a lack of CD-RW support. Here we had finally come to terms with not being able to watch Coyote Ugly on our Mac OS X-booted PowerBook (we're recovering nicely from the ensuing stroke, thank you very much), and now it turns out that we won't be able to burn CDs, either? "Sources have previously said the new OS will not permit DVD playback or recording, but its inability to record CDs was not clear until now." Fetch the heart pills, Mabel, 'cause our left arms are going numb!

Seriously, let us get this straight; despite knowing full well that Mac OS X doesn't yet support DVD-ROM drives-- hardware that's been shipping in several Macs for years, now-- we're supposed to be surprised that the operating system doesn't yet support CD-RW drives which have only been shipping in Macs since January? Maybe we're just overly-realistic when it comes to teeny little efforts like a decade-long attempt to overhaul an operating system that hasn't changed its guts since 1984, but somehow the "news" that Mac OS X doesn't yet fully support a system component that's only been shipping for a whopping two months utterly fails to fill us with consternation and uproar.

We know, we know... Apple has been flooding the airwaves with its "Rip. Mix. Burn." message, and it's slightly incongruous that its new operating system isn't yet a part of that story. Believe us, the irony is not lost on us. At the same time, though, we fully appreciate that there's a reason Apple isn't shipping Macs with Mac OS X pre-loaded for another four months, just as there's a reason why the operating system's Saturday rollout will be low-key. Call us ol' softies, but we'll reserve the frothing moral outrage for really nasty stuff, like perhaps a kernel panic and crash that irreparably corrupts our separate Mac OS 9 partition-- we don't plan to waste it on a temporary delay in burning CDs and watching movies.

 
SceneLink (2937)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 3/21/01 episode:

March 21, 2001: It's still officially three days away, but CNET keeps laying into Mac OS X-- this time for lack of CD-RW support. Meanwhile, word has it that different-colored PowerBooks are on the horizon, and if you thought Intel was the bad guy and Motorola was the good guy, try looking at things from a wireless networking perspective...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2938: Fashion Comes To Pro-Ville (3/21/01)   So what's with Apple's long-held belief that only consumers like color choices? Granted, the company's first and only foray into the "colors for pros" area didn't go over too well, what with the Blueberry-and-Ice Power Mac G3 looking more like a Smurf condo than a professional workstation, but surely something more muted like Indigo would have been simply smashing...

  • 2939: Knowing Whom To Root For (3/21/01)   Ah, this wacky high-tech business world and all its strange bedfellows... you probably thought you knew who the enemies were, didn't you? Microsoft, for one; aside from the obvious fact that Apple represents the forces of good and Microsoft is evil incarnate, from a purely business perspective, Windows is obviously the Mac's biggest competitor for operating system market share...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1247 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).