The Cube Shall Riseth Again? (7/5/01)
SceneLink
 

So was it a wuss-out intended only to save face and grant false hope to its grieving customers, or is Apple genuinely open to the possibility of someday popping the Cube out of its deep-freeze tray and sticking it back on store shelves? Apple fans the world over zeroed in on the company's unusual wording in its official notice of the Cube's demise: "Apple Puts Power Mac G4 Cube on Ice"; the company will "suspend production"; "there is a small chance" that Apple will "reintroduce" the product in the future. That's hardly the same as saying "the Cube was a massive sales failure and we're cutting our losses by rounding up all unsold units and firing them directly into the sun so that they may blight our balance sheet no longer."

What's the deal? Apple could just as easily have granted the Cube a silent and obscure death, letting it slip quietly from the price list when new Macs debut in two weeks' time. Instead, the company issues an honest-to-goodness press release announcing the fate of the product. Does that seem normal to you? Product introductions are one thing, but we can't imagine that any company typically expends the time, effort, and money to tell the world when it's cancelling a product. (We notice that the usual "quote from Steve" is conspicuously absent; since the Cube was Steve's baby, he may have been too overwrought to comment.)

This seemingly bizarre behavior and open-ended wording has prompted several true believers to cling to hope of a Cube resurrection someday. The Cube-Zone has already launched a petition-- and as faithful viewer the M@d H@tter (who else?) points out, Mac OS Rumors claims that Apple is indeed keeping the Cube on ice until the company needs "reserve firepower" in the form of a "marketing boost." One current plan? "Bringing the Cube back with spiffed-up plastics or even a stamped-metal enclosure as the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Mac next year."

Not to be party poopers or anything, but we can't see Apple reviving the Cube anytime soon... if at all. Think about Apple's history in the Second Jobs Dynasty. For the most part it's been a rousing tale of success despite overwhelming odds; you've got your return to sustained profitability, your skyrocketing stock price, the iMac phenomenon, etc. There have really only been two big stumbling blocks in recent memory: the original G4 speed dump (and its resulting earnings warning), and deadly slow sales of the Cube (and its resulting earnings warning). Sure, the Cube won a zillion design awards, but it's been forever tainted with the stigma of failure. We don't expect Apple to ship a revamped Cube as the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Mac any more than we'd expect the company to ship a 450 MHz Power Mac G4 next year at $2499 "just for old times' sake"; it's only going to remind the press of one of Apple's biggest missteps since kicking Steve out in the first place.

No, the way we see it, the Cube is gone-- and either Steve couldn't bear to admit that the product (at least the way it was sold) was a mistake, or Apple thinks it's helping Mac fans by leaving the door open for a "Search For Spock"-like return that it never actually plans to bring about. (Actually, we're betting the press release was an attempt to get the bad vibes and stock price deflation out of the way now, so it doesn't taint the good news in store at the Expo-- but that's just us.) In our opinion, it's far better to mourn the Cube's passing and move on than to cling to false hope of a miraculous rebirth. Besides, miraculous rebirths aren't nearly as impressive if you're actually expecting them.

 
SceneLink (3158)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 7/5/01 episode:

July 5, 2001: Macworld Expo is bearing down on us like a freight train, scaring up rumors of the iMac's code name and new colors for the Power Mac. Meanwhile, faithful optimists whisper of the Cube's future rebirth, possibly as the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary Macintosh, and reports that Adobe's Mac OS X development efforts are all but stalled out can't bode well for the future of that fledgling operating system...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3157: Two Rumors, No Waiting (7/5/01)   We love the fourteen days prior to any Macworld Expo for two reasons: one, we're less than a fortnight away from yet another scrumptious Stevenote; and two, it gives us a reason to use the word "fortnight" without people looking at us funny...

  • 3159: Smells Like An Exit Strategy (7/5/01)   You all know that Adobe is skipping Macworld Expo this time around, allegedly for financial reasons (though the company seems to be doing pretty well on the money front, relatively speaking). For the most part, we ignored the first round of conspiracy theories regarding Adobe's no-show status, because most of it was simply too obvious for words...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).