"Oops, Our Bad-- Tee Hee" (8/17/01)
SceneLink
 

"Gee, AtAT, how come you haven't worked Microsoft's latest QuickTime-crippling IE upgrade into the script yet?" That's what we're hearing from dozens of fans. (Well, maybe minus the "gee" part; perhaps we need to cut back on our "Leave It To Beaver" intake.) True, the issue first surfaced two whole weeks ago, and we haven't touched it yet, but that's because Microsoft's latest "mistake" is so obviously an overt anticompetitive sleazoid move, we figured everybody already knew the score. But then we overheard somebody state, without the tiniest hint of irony in his voice, that he felt Microsoft's latest QuickTime "oops" was an honest mistake and not part of some massive conspiracy to undermine Apple's media technology. And geez, we certainly couldn't let that pass without comment.

For those of you who have no idea what the heck we're talking about, faithful viewer Scott Naness has kindly pointed out a handy CNET article which describes the phenomenon. Here's the gist: Microsoft's most recent Service Pack for Internet Explorer (the Windows version) breaks the QuickTime plug-in completely. Why, you ask? Because after the Service Pack is applied, IE 5.5 (and the upcoming IE 6) no longer supports plug-ins at all. Instead, Microsoft is-- try not to die of shock, here-- pushing its own ActiveX technology as "the" way to link web content to desktop applications. Heck, we're actually stunned the company didn't pull a move like this sooner; it managed to antitrustify Netscape into irrelevance ages ago, so it was inevitable that any sort of Netscape technologies (like the browser plug-in) would soon be shown the door.

The problem appears to be that Microsoft kinda sorta neglected to mention this little architectural change to anyone-- particularly Apple, whose QuickTime media software is probably now regarded by millions of IE for Windows users as a steaming pile of nonfunctioning garbage. Meanwhile, Apple is now scrambling to "fix" QuickTime so that it works with Microsoft's new "No Plug-Ins Allowed" browser. And yet there are apparently still people out there who feel this was an honest mistake on Microsoft's part.

Evidently said people have forgotten that nearly three years ago, Apple software veep Avie Tevanian testified in the "Redmond Justice" trial that Microsoft threatened to cease development of Office for the Mac unless Apple "knifed the baby" by dropping QuickTime for Windows completely. They also seem to have forgotten Avie's claim that when Apple refused, Microsoft had deliberately introduced error messages into Windows so that QuickTime for Windows users would be prompted to switch back to Microsoft's own "ActiveMovie" software instead. (Shades of the Caldera rogue error messages; same sleazeball tactic, different competitor to squelch.) It is also quite possible that said people are on some serious drugs; who can say? Meanwhile, Microsoft promises a fix "soon," by which time thousands of Windows users will have already purged QuickTime from their systems. Hey, somebody sue these guys for antitru-- oh, yeah. Never mind.

 
SceneLink (3249)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 8/17/01 episode:

August 17, 2001: Think the Cube is a work of modern art? MoMA evidently agrees with you. Meanwhile, Microsoft's latest update to Internet Explorer for Windows "accidentally" breaks QuickTime, and "Redmond Justice" heads into the home stretch as the Court of Appeals denies Microsoft's request for yet another delay...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3248: But We Know What We Like (8/17/01)   You know that old saw, "be careful what you wish for"? We're thinking that Apple's marketing department might want to take that advice a little more seriously now that its ad copy has apparently come true, with disastrous consequences...

  • 3250: Hurtling Toward The Finale (8/17/01)   While we hardly like to characterize the Federal Appeals Court as some sort of "Antitrust Nazi," we can't pass up this chance to summarize its latest message to Microsoft thusly: "NO STAY FOR YOU!!" Yes, kiddies, "Redmond Justice" is back in full swing, and the appeals court continues to surprise and delight fans of antitrust drama by shaking off its early characterization as a Microsoft-friendly entity and instead sending Bill's minions running for cover...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1241 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).