"New" Server / New "Server" (9/7/01)
SceneLink
 

Man, what a bummer way to wind up a week: with a heaping helping of Rumor Smackdown. While we still haven't heard anything that contradicts our last mysterious tip-off that speedy new PowerBooks are slated to surface before the month is up (thank heaven!), faithful viewer Zorro informs us that the recently-reported September 13th target date for a Mac OS X 10.1 release is woefully overoptimistic. Instead, given the current state of development, an introduction at the Apple Expo in Paris on the 26th is far more likely. While that doesn't come as any particular surprise, it is mildly disappointing for those of us who were hoping that the shipping-next-week prediction over at Mac OS Rumors would let us experience Puma a couple of weeks early. (And no, the fact that the latest MacConnection catalog says that 10.1 is "now shipping" doesn't make it so.)

Worse yet, though, for those of you who blithely ignored Uncle Steve's official declaration that there would be no "new hardware products" launched in Paris this year, now you've got even less of a reason to expect a surprise introduction of those long-rumored rack-mount servers that Apple is supposedly kicking around in its secret underground labs. See, some people took the fact that Apple's Power Mac G4 Servers did notget updated with the advent of the new Quicksilver Power Macs a couple of months ago as a hint that something "entirely other" in the server arena was imminent. And it was something of a reasonable assumption, when you think about it; Apple's servers have long been standard current Power Macs with additional software, RAM, and storage. The company's two-month delay in migrating its servers to the new Quicksilver chassis and processor specs certainly implied that some real servers might be just around the corner.

Sadly, though, the prospects of racklicious new servers debuting this month just pretty much dwindled to zero. As noted by The Register, Apple has finally quietly updated its Power Mac G4 Server-- and it's just an entry-level Quicksilver G4/733 with 256 MB of RAM, an 80 GB hard drive, and a bundled copy of Mac OS X Server. Not that we'd set fire to one if it magically appeared on our doorstep one evening, of course, but it's definitely not the "real" server that some people have been waiting for-- and the manner in which Apple introduced this new configuration completely under the radar isn't exactly conducive to hoopla and merriment, which, at the end of the day, is pretty much all we're interested in, anyway.

So, that's one more piece of rumored Apple gear that likely won't be dropping jaws at either of the company's end-of-September events. At this point we're resigned to seeing the new PowerBook and nothing else-- not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. But here's hoping we're not wrong about the PowerBook, because otherwise we're going to fall into a hardware-deprivation coma until the mythical LCD iMac finally materializes.

 
SceneLink (3291)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 9/7/01 episode:

September 7, 2001: Litigation fans, rejoice; Apple is once again being sued for patent infringement by somebody looking for a quick score. Meanwhile, Apple quietly releases a new server, but it's not what you may have been hoping for, and CNET compares Apple's tech support to Microsoft's-- the results may surprise you...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3290: "Smells Like Team Shalit" (9/7/01)   Hey, Kids, Lawsuits! Well, okay, make that "lawsuit," singular, but for those of you still mourning the end of that $1.1 billion suit that got slapped against Apple by a rinky-dink outfit called Imatec who claimed that ColorSync infringed its patents, this new bit o' litigation ought to have you grinning like a madman...

  • 3292: Lest Ye Become A Monster (9/7/01)   Is there any greater joy than discovering yet another CNET-sponsored, multi-stage product and/or service "showdown"? If there is, we sure hope we never encounter it, because our heads would likely explode with delight...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1245 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).