15,000 Folks Can't Be Wrong (2/7/02)
SceneLink
 

The people have spoken-- and the people don't like it. We speak, of course, of the latest development in "Redmond Justice," which, at 412 years and counting, is the longest-running antitrust drama still on the air. You may recall that the last time we checked in, despite having proven repeatedly that Microsoft illegally abused its monopoly power, the Justice Department came under new management and subsequently folded like a cheap card table among a stampede of elephants. Microsoft and the DoJ came up with a settlement proposal so toothless it made your average Elmo and Ernie look like Marie frickin' Osmond.

As it turns out, though, according to a provision in the Tunney Act, no such settlement could be approved by the judge until after a sixty-day period of public comment; the idea is to help ensure that any such settlement be in the best interest of the public at large. Well, that 60-day period has come and gone, the comments were counted, and the numbers are pretty much what we expected: according to a CNET report, the DoJ received approximately 15,000 comments against the proposed settlement, and a mere 7,500 in favor of it. That's two to one looking for a real remedy, among people who cared enough to write in.

Strangely enough, CNET reports that the DoJ also received 1,250 responses "unrelated to the case" and another 7,000 that "expressed no sentiment either way." The unrelated messages we understand, since spam is rampant, but why would 7,000 people bother to write in just to say, "Ah, whatever"? Faithful viewer Bill Lisowski got to the bottom of that, though, by noticing that CNN reports that the messages that allegedly "expressed no sentiment" generally expressed strong sentiment, but were actually "dismissed as opinion, like 'I hate Microsoft.'" (Personally, we'd think that 7,000 "I hate Microsoft" letters might actually say something pretty important about the case, but hey, it's not our show.)

Anyway, apparently Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly has hinted that Microsoft and the DoJ should consider reworking that settlement a little bit in light of the fact that so many people are opposed to it in its current form. She's supposed to meet with both sides tomorrow, at which point we may get some indication as to whether or not she plans to accept the proposal in a month or two. In the meantime, those of you who took time out to send your comments to the DoJ-- whether for or against the settlement proposal-- should give yourselves a pat on the back for doing that whole civic duty thing. (That sounded appropriately impartial, right?)


 
SceneLink (3555)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases


 

The above scene was taken from the 2/7/02 episode:

February 7, 2002: Apple's not working on set-top boxes, but it is doing some neat things with UNIX these days. Meanwhile, Apple buys out a company that makes high-end 3D compositing software, and the Justice Department reveals that public comments about the proposed "Redmond Justice" settlement are running two to one against it...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3553: He Also Likes "Family Ties" (2/7/02)   Looks like we were right to bite the bullet and finally get TiVo, since it's now been confirmed that, despite its "digital hub" strategy, Apple has no current plans to make its own similar device. Faithful viewer Stephanie pointed out that ZDNet's David Coursey is still bragging about his recent hour-long meeting with Steve Jobs...

  • 3554: Shaking With Excitement (2/7/02)   Speaking of Apple sneaking into new markets, what's up with the company's stealth purchase of Nothing Real? If you're a slave to Mac dirt, you've doubtless heard about this by now-- as noted by faithful viewer Jason Wardle, several news outlets (including VFXPro and MacMinute) are reporting that, yes indeedy, Apple busted out the checkbook again and forked over an undisclosed sum for the creator of such applications as Shake and Tremor...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1233 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).