Hook 'Em With Cuteness (2/12/02)
SceneLink
 

Speaking of QuickTime content, faithful viewer Sledgehammer Smythe was the first to point out that there are a couple of new additions to Apple's ads page-- or, at least, there were. From last night until this afternoon, there were two new iMac spots linked there, which have since mysteriously vanished. Fear not, though; there's still a link to the action on Apple's QuickTime page, which means that you're just a couple of clicks away from seeing what happens when two Jobsian companies collide.

Yep, them rumors were no jive; none other than Pixar, Steve's other little enterprise, was tapped to produce a couple of short animated spots introducing the new iMac to the world. One piece is thirty seconds long and shows the iMac hopping joyfully about to a peppy techno number while apparently emanating some distinctly R2-D2esque chirps and whistles; eventually it calms down enough to say "hi." The other is just fifteen seconds in length, but we consider it to be the far more effective of the two; the iMac watches curiously as its SuperDrive tray repeatedly extends and retracts, until it's embarrassed to notice that it has an audience. You have to see it to appreciate it, but believe us when we say that Pixar's talent for humanizing the inert shines through again.

Of course, the appearance of these two spots on Apple's ads page is no doubt kicking up the usual firestorm of controversy about whether or not the new ads suck. We can hear the complaints already-- "doesn't tell you anything about the system," "where are the price/performance figures," "why is the new iMac staring at its private parts," etc. Before you get too worked up, we should probably mention that we're pretty sure these aren't actual TV commercials (yet). For one thing, honest-to-goodness ads tend to appear on Apple's web site only after they've debuted in a very visible time slot on network TV, and we have yet to receive a single report from anyone who's seen either piece on the air. For another, Apple refers to them as "short films" and not as commercials, despite the fact that they happen to appear in the "ads" directory on its server. There's also the fact that they were yanked from Apple's real ads page, probably in an attempt to stem exactly this sort of confusion.

Now, while some of you are heaving a sigh of relief that the public's televisual introduction to the iMac won't be the two spots that faithful viewer Jeff has already dubbed "Never Take Acid During an Aerobics Workout" and "New iMac Caught Using Digital Viagra," we should also mention that we think they'd make lovely commercials. Let's face it: thirty seconds is a woefully short period of time in which to convey any substantive information, and any attempt by Apple to capture the public's attention with product specs, comparative performance numbers, or the like would probably be doomed to fail. The iMac's biggest strength from a sales perspective is its personality, and these two spots have so much of the stuff it's dripping all over the rug. Make the public smile, and they might just go looking for more info on the iMac when computer-shopping time rolls around.

If nothing else, we think these spots would make great eyeball-grabbing teaser ads that could be followed up by more developed pieces underscoring the iMac's versatility as a powerful digital hub. In any case, these animations are way too cute to confine to the 'net, so we hope Apple finds some way to get them in front of a broader audience. Ah, heck, if nothing else, we suppose Steve can just stick 'em in front of the next Pixar feature.


 
SceneLink (3563)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far


 

The above scene was taken from the 2/12/02 episode:

February 12, 2002: QuickTime 6 is here, sort of, but Phil Schiller is fighting for the rights of the working content provider. Meanwhile, Apple posts new iMac "ads" done up by the otherStevely Pixar, and a 10-Q filing finally puts a number on Apple's recent job cuts...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3562: Phil S.: Viva La Revolucion! (2/12/02)   Oh that wacky Phil Schiller; always fomenting uprising and rebellion! Actually, you know, we never really thought of him as the freedom fighter type; he looks a little more like the guy you'd eat nachos with while watching a golf instructional video...

  • 3564: Pink Slips, Sans Frenzy (2/12/02)   Heads up, people; it's 10-Q time again, which means that fans of overly-cautious, bordering-on-gloomy financial filings can pore over a ridiculously huge volume of stuff in hopes of extracting some relevant dirt about everyone's favorite Cupertino fruit market...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1233 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).