Always Get It In Writing (2/22/02)
SceneLink
 

Hey, remember back in 1997 when Apple signed that contract in blood at midnight by a crossroads where a virtuous man was murdered? Well, actually, we're mostly just guessing about the specific circumstances of the formal agreement, but by Apple's own admission, it did make a pact with Microsoft-- a pact that gave a lot of us Mac fans a serious case of the willies. So it's kinda hard not to imagine Bill Gates having been present with horns, a pointy tail, and a golden fiddle straight out of an early '80s crossover country hit. (Tacky? Maybe. But just because he's the ultimate personification of evil, that doesn't mean it's easy for him to accessorize. "Hey, Melinda, does this pitchfork make my butt look big?")

Setting aside for a moment the burning issue of Bill's diabolical accoutrements, basically, here's what happened: Apple agreed to drop its patent infringement claims against Redmond and switch to Internet Explorer from Netscape, while Microsoft agreed to invest $150 million in Apple stock and promised that Office would stay on the Mac platform for five more years. Well, a quick glance at a CNET article pointed out to us by faithful viewer Alex Gunkel (or, alternatively, a quick thumbing through the wiener puppy calendar on the wall in the kitchen) reminds us that the clock's a-tickin' on those five years of guaranteed Officeness. To be precise, once August rolls around, Microsoft has the option of taking its Big Ball O' Bloatware™ and going home.

Apple, for its part, claims not to be worried, because it and Microsoft are now so chummy; Phil Schiller, for instance, states that "it's not an issue today, a contracted commitment between Apple and [Microsoft's] Macintosh Business Unit for the future of Office products. They have shown us in many ways their commitment to the Mac." Microsoft's Kevin Browne concurs; the two companies are much more buddy-buddy today than they were in 1997, and so "Microsoft and Apple have not talked about doing any formal renewal of the agreement." Indeed, we doubt there's much to worry about, since Microsoft certainly didn't amass its hoard of filthy lucre by cancelling profitable products-- and Mac versions of Office are profitable indeed. We've also long suspected that there's a sort of unspoken understanding between Cupertino and Redmond: Apple carves out a healthy niche that stays nicely at or below a 10% market share level, and Microsoft supports the unthreatening Mac platform as a convenient hedge against further antitrust ickiness with the Justice Department. So we're incurable cynics. Sue us.

But CNET raises some interesting points about the Apple-Microsoft relationship not being all penny whistles and moon pies. While Steve refused to get on the stand and testify against Microsoft during the "Redmond Justice" trials (he wisely sent Avie Tevanian instead), His Steveness did recently make a big public stink about Microsoft's proposed antitrust settlement that would flood the nation's poorest schools with Windows; soon after, the proposal was shot down. And let's not forget the rumors that Steve himself initiated and funded "Redmond Justice" in the first place. We have to imagine there's a lot of acrimony on both sides swimming around just under the surface; how deep it runs may determine what happens to the Mac version of Office once this summer winds to a close. And maybe it's just the cynicism talking, but when it comes to an agreement with Microsoft, we'd much rather have a signed contract than a smile and an "understanding."

 
SceneLink (3586)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 2/22/02 episode:

February 22, 2002: That infamous Apple-Microsoft contract expires in August-- but neither side feels a need to extend it because both companies are such chums nowadays. Meanwhile, now that biologists want rack-mountable Macs, maybe we'll finally see some coming out of Cupertino, and Bill Gates addresses a Tokyo crowd wearing a very... familiar sort of outfit...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3587: Right Power, Wrong Shape (2/22/02)   We've been hearing whispers about honest-to-goodness server Macs for the better part of a year, now, and we've still got zilch to show for it; Apple's idea of a server is still just a regular desktop Power Mac with a hefty chunk of extra software on the hard drive...

  • 3588: Raiding Steve Jobs's Closet (2/22/02)   As you well know, we tend to go on and on (and on and on and on and on) about Michael Dell's increasingly obvious obsession with Steve Jobs and the man's many transparent attempts to duplicate His Steveness's strategies and accomplishments...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1241 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).