Uh, Better Make That April (2/28/02)
SceneLink
 

Following up on yesterday's Teenage Mutant Ninja iMacs revelation, whether the hitch is indeed a "radiation problem" (as Merrill Lynch contends) or some far less interesting issue, it's pretty clear that, for whatever reason, iMacs just aren't flying off the production lines like they should. Anecdotal evidence from out in the field suggests that LCD iMacs are harder to find than a dachshund packin' heat-- and what with dachshunds being noted for their non-violent natures and their lack of opposable thumbs, well, those iMacs are pretty scarce indeed.

Not that this hasn't happened several times in the past (heck, it was practically mandatory as far as new PowerBooks were concerned), but it's starting to look like Steve was being just a mite too optimistic when he announced those ship dates last month. Yes, Apple did indeed manage to ship the high-end SuperDrive model (well, one or two, anyway) by the end of January, as Steve had promised. But as for his expectation that the $1499 combo drive model would ship in February, the latest evidence (i.e. the fact that Steve is now mere hours away from flipping his Dawson's Creek calendar over to March) suggests that he may have been ever so slightly off.

Worse yet, MacUser has the latest skinny on the missing iMac syndrome, and because of unspecified "serious problems on the production line" (use your imagination; "Good lord, that wiener dog's running around loose-- and he's got a semiautomatic!"), apparently Apple has been quietly "warning dealers to expect virtually no mid-range and low-end models until April." Given that Apple's revenue estimates were based on shipping substantial numbers of all three models this quarter, if two of the three barely even make a token appearance until April, that Q2 balance sheet might turn out very ugly indeed. Because of this, according to MacMinute, Credit Suisse First Boston has followed Merrill Lynch's lead and warned its investors that Apple's iMac shipments this quarter may fall short by as many as 100,000 units-- so Apple might be in for a bit of a black eye when the analysts hear some sad quarterly revenue figures come April.

Of course, it's entirely possible that none of this Wall Street malarkey means squat to you, and all you want is to buy one of the elusive little critters. (iMacs, that is-- not analysts, or gun-toting wiener dogs.) Well, we did a quick poke around, and it's true that very few places seem to have them in stock; even our local Apple retail store is cleaned out and the waiting list is reportedly "wicked long." But we found that at least one Apple store claims to have them in stock and ready to take home tonight, so if you're persistent, success is within your grasp. Because, you know, opposable thumbs.

 
SceneLink (3598)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 2/28/02 episode:

February 28, 2002: Apple's iMac woes continue, as word leaks out that the non-SuperDrive models may not surface until April. Meanwhile, the iPod proves to be the perfect tool for retail-dwelling data thieves, and Dell does its part for democracy by halting the export of laptops to Pennsylvania...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3599: The iPod: Instrument Of Evil (2/28/02)   In an effort to justify blowing $399 on a portable digital music device (surely the nicest portable digital music device available, but a portable digital music device all the same), iPod owners are often prone to rationalizing their purchases by noting ways they can use them above and beyond the relatively frivolous "it lets me listen to lots of music."...

  • 3600: Still Protecting Our Borders (2/28/02)   Say, remember last month when we praised Dell for its clever antiterrorism tactic of casually asking each customer ordering from its UK web site whether or not the PC in question would be used in connection with "weapons of mass destruction," "nuclear applications," "missile technology," or "chemical or biological weapons purposes"?...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).