Fun With Math And English (3/22/02)
SceneLink
 

Hmmm, apparently Steve's math does not resemble our Earth math. According to MacMinute, during his keynote address in Tokyo a couple of days ago, ol' Jobsy took umbrage at recent allegations that, at the height of the iMac drought, Apple had been funneling more than its fair share of available units to its own retail stores, while the shelves of third-party resellers made Old Mother Hubbard's pantry look like the dog food aisle at Petco. Not so, said Steve; Apple has been playing entirely fair with its long-suffering resellers, as befits the promise it made that, when it came time to divvy up the goods, the company would never favor its own stores over those of its partners.

There's just one problem with that: the figures he gave to back up that assertion just leave us scratching our heads. According to the Stevester, Apple's 28 retail stores have gotten "only 25,000" new iMacs. Only 25 grand? This is obviously some strange use of the word "only" that we weren't previously aware of, because that's almost 900 iMacs per store. Meanwhile, none of the resellers we've heard from report having received even ninety, let alone 900, with most claiming that they've gotten only between fifteen and sixty units. (Note, Steve, the proper contextual use of the word "only" in that sentence to indicate fewer units than expected or appropriate.)

Moreover, Steve insisted that "90 percent" of the new iMacs were shipping to channels other than Apple's own retail stores. Unfortunately, he also mentioned that Apple has shipped 125,000 iMacs since the product's introduction in January. Grab a calculator and you'll soon see that there's something wrong, here; 90% of 125,000 is 112,500 iMacs for the resellers, leaving 12,500 for the Apple retail stores. But riddle us this, Batman: if Apple's boutiques received "only" 25,000, where did the extra 12,500 iMacs come from? Huh? (We're thinking maybe Venus.)

Still, though, even if Steve played a little fast and loose with the numbers, it is worth noting that, in any case, he's basically right: "most" of the iMacs did go to Apple's resellers. Unfortunately, there are a whole lot more Apple resellers than Apple retail stores, so while only ten or twenty percent of the iMacs were kept "in the family," that still means that Apple's boutiques each got something like 900 iMacs while everyone else got maybe a tenth that many, if they were lucky. Whether the numbers add up or not, you have to admit, Steve was essentially telling the truth. It's like Yogi Berra once said: running Apple is ninety percent mental; the other half is spin. Or something like that.

 
SceneLink (3643)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 3/22/02 episode:

March 22, 2002: Steve insists that Apple isn't playing favorites when it comes to iMac distribution, but his math's a little funny. Meanwhile, the Jobsinator once again pulls in a one-dollar salary, but this time his stock options are actually worth something, and due to delays with the GeForce4 Titanium, Apple revives a strikingly familiar strategy to keep the populace calm...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3644: One Dollar (Plus 43 Million) (3/22/02)   As far as CEOs go, most of you would probably agree that Steve Jobs ranks right up there near the top of the list; those of you who are old enough to recall the Dark Days of 1996 most likely still consider it nothing short of a miracle that Steve was somehow able to keep the company from cratering in a thick, choking cloud of financial insolvency...

  • 3645: Free Cards All Over Again (3/22/02)   We seem to be experiencing the most extraordinary feeling of déjà vu. Remember about a year ago, when folks who had pre-ordered their Power Macs with barn-burning nVIDIA GeForce3 graphics cards were starting to get a little antsy about their Macs being in Assembly Limbo?...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1246 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).