You Are Cleared For Takeoff (4/19/02)
SceneLink
 

Question: How can Apple make AirPort go faster? (The first person that says "grease its runways" gets a smack upside the head.) Because, as you know, we've all been hearing about faster AirPort implementations coming "real soon now" since, oh, we'd say roughly about the end of the Battle of Hastings. The tricky bit is that AirPort is based on the 802.11b standard, and while there's a faster 54 Mbps 802.11a floating around out there, the two aren't compatible because they operate at different frequencies-- and we doubt Apple's going to move to a standard that won't work with any existing AirPort cards or Base Stations. But there has to be a way to increase AirPort's bandwidth without sacrificing compatibility, and it has to happen sometime, right? So as long as rumormongers keep bringing it up, eventually it has to come to pass.

Seriously, we're not just saying that. If you were beginning to despair about the prospect of AirPort ever being able to break out of its 11 Mbps box, trust us; it can be done, and we have proof. According to an article in PC World, U.S. Robotics has already announced a new line of 802.11b-compatible wireless networking products that will be available in June and will run at a relatively zippy 22 Mbps-- while retaining full backward compatibility with older AirPort-style 11 Mbps devices, and providing "better range," to boot. (This is apparently that technology that was expected to become the 802.11g standard, although it sounds like the standards committee passed it over.) That all sounds great, except for one thing: it's not being made by Apple.

However, U.S. Robotics fully expects that now that it's announced the first 22 Mbps wireless products based on Texas Instruments' ACX100 chip (where all the magic happens), announcements from other companies will follow "in a matter of weeks." Could one such company be Apple? Sure, Apple likes to lead where it can-- AirPort itself was really the first consumer-priced wireless networking architecture that didn't suck-- but it's not at all out of the question that we might see an announcement of a line of me-too ACX100-based double-speed AirPort products within a month or two.

Or maybe not. Faithful viewer Joe Radosevich tells us that Mac OS Rumors is cranking out tales of a new set of AirPort gear that Apple has been schlepping to secret demos for certain Left Coast educational institutions. Apparently Apple has pooh-poohed this whole "twice as fast" nonsense and really gone for the throat, wirelessly speaking; allegedly this stuff somehow manages to do its thing at a whopping 112 Mbps, representing a full tenfold increase in bandwidth, and with a range boost, too. A tenfold increase? Considering that the technology that was going to be 802.11g reportedly tops out at 54 Mbps, it sounds like Apple just may have told backward compatibility to take a hike after all.

Then again, 802.11a (the incompatible wireless standard just coming to market) reportedly maxes out at 54 Mbps, too, so we really have no idea what Apple may have done to more than double that speed. Assuming the reports are true, all we can guess is that dark and arcane magicks are involved. And possibly animal sacrifice.

 
SceneLink (3699)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 4/19/02 episode:

April 19, 2002: In light of a class action suit that's moving forward, Apple's official stance on the lack of Mac OS X support for legacy ATI chips suddenly becomes a whole lot less final. Meanwhile, rumors fly about a new version of AirPort that runs at ten times the speed, and Microsoft informs its customers that only crazy people would ever expect security features when clicking Internet Explorer's "Back" button...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3698: Uh, Did It Always Say That? (4/19/02)   Boy howdy, it sure is interesting what sort of policy changes a little well-placed litigation can shake loose, isn't it? You're probably already familiar with the long-standing complaint among several Mac users that, despite the fact that their Macs (such as Bondi Blue iMacs, original iBooks, beige G3s, etc.)...

  • 3700: Go "Back" At Your Own Risk (4/19/02)   Okay, help us clear up a little confusion, here... Bill Gates really did issue a companywide memo urging all Microsoft employees to usher in a new era of "trustworthy" computing by putting security ahead of new features, right?...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).