Gotta Have It Now Now NOW (1/9/03)
SceneLink
 

Sounds like Apple's got a hit on its hands, at least if the ratings are any indication; MacMinute reports that, during a keynote of his own yesterday, Phil "Love Me, Love My Carpet" Schiller revealed that no fewer than 300,000 rabid Mac users descended upon Apple's hapless flock of servers and snapped up the public beta release of Safari, the company's spiffy new web browser, on its first day of release. "Is that a lot?" you ask. "Well, yes," we answer. According to Phil, the most release-day downloads Apple's logged previously was a comparatively puny 100,000 back when iTunes came out, so it's pretty safe to say that this totally crushes Apple's previous first-day download record into a pile of fine dust and then sets said dust on fire.

Just to put things into a smidgen of perspective (aw, c'mon-- a teensy little bit won't kill you), let's think about those numbers another way. During the Stevenote, Fearless Leader indicated that there are now five million active users of Mac OS X, did he not? Well, Safari's a Mac OS X-only browser, which means that roughly one in every sixteen users who could run Safari ran out and grabbed it the first day it went public. And actually, that's not really true, either, since Safari requires Jaguar, and we sincerely doubt that 100% of the Mac OS X user community has shelled out for the upgrade. So we're blithely going to take a semi-educated guess and figure that there are maybe three million Jaguar users tops, which means that one in ten of the target market felt an urgent need to scarf up Safari within its first twenty-four hours on this side of Cupertino's Silicon Curtain.

Of course, first-day download numbers aren't necessarily an indication of success; just because 300,000 people tuned in to watch doesn't mean that 300,000 people actually liked what they saw. What this really says is that Apple did a good job in identifying a need-- i.e., Mac OS X users want a web browser that isn't IE, and if that browser is free and comes from Apple, all the better. Whether or not Safari fills that need remains to be seen, but so far the feedback filtering into the AtAT compound has been pretty overwhelmingly positive. Oh, sure, most people want some additional features tossed in, such as tabbed browsing, bookmarks that can indicate if a site's changed since the last visit, etc. (Personally, we're hoping Apple adds RSS support, a macro-type feature like OmniWeb's Shortcuts, and at the very least the ability to see the URL of a link before actually clicking it.) But this is a beta, Apple can add features over time, and overall, thumbs are already pointing in the general direction known as "up."

If you're the type that likes to keep your ear to the ground in some generally seedy places, you may have encountered some rumors a while back that Microsoft had no plans to develop Internet Explorer for Mac OS X beyond bug fixes to the current version. If that turns out to be true, it's now pretty easy to guess why. On a broader scale, we're getting pretty intrigued to see how this swipe at Redmond (not to mention that other little shot across the bow-- namely, Keynote's attempt to out-PowerPoint PowerPoint) affects Microsoft's plans to continue porting Office to the Mac, since the company is no longer contractually obligated to do so. Is there a war brewin' behind the scenes?

 
SceneLink (3896)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 1/9/03 episode:

January 9, 2003: Safari sets a new first-day download record as the fans go ape. Meanwhile, Steve Jobs has a few words to say on CNBC about the state of the economy, and Steve Wozniak ISN'T USING MAC OS X! Well, at least not exclusively...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3897: Steve: We're All Gonna Freeze (1/9/03)   So we stumbled across a notice at MacMinute yesterday informing us that Steve Jobs was slated to make a guest appearance on CNBC's Business Center show last night-- which is just about the only thing that'd ever get us to tune in to CNBC in the first place, because we're actually pretty allergic to that sort of all-financial and/or -news programming...

  • 3898: Other Steve: 9's Just Fine (1/9/03)   And if one harbinger of doom isn't enough for you today, how about this Macworld headline? "Even Woz Still Uses Mac OS 9." That's right, folks; apparently the Other Steve, a man well-respected-- nay, deified-- for his technological prowess and vision (remember, he's the one who built the actual computers while Jobs built the company), has sided with the anti-Mac OS X crowd and chosen to stick steadfastly with old-school tech...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).