Warning: Math Alert! (1/15/04)
SceneLink
 

Oh, for crying out Pete's sake-- we just said we aren't math whizzes, and yet now we're going to have to bust out the calculator anyway just to convince you people that Apple isn't about to collapse into insolvency or something. You all know that Apple's quarterly earnings conference call revealed a ton of good news, right? Well, faithful viewer Mace notes that, according to IDC figures reported by MacNN, "Apple last year shipped 1,675,000 units compared with 1,679,000 in 2002." (They're talking about Macs, not iPods or anything like that.) So Apple shipped fewer Macs last year than in the year before-- which, granted, doesn't sound good at all.

But here's the thing: remember how in the fourth calendar quarter of 2003 (that'd be fiscal Q1/04, the one we just heard about yesterday) Apple reported that it had "shipped 829 thousand Macintosh units during the quarter, up 12 percent from the year-ago quarter"? That's important. Hang onto that juicy little tidbit while we take you on a little tour of Quarterly Earnings Past.

For the third calendar quarter of 2003, Apple reported that it had shipped 787,000 Macs, which was "up 7 percent from the year-ago quarter." For the quarter before that, it said that it had shipped 771,000 Macs-- but there was no mention of how that compared to the year before, which should be a clue. Well, as it turns out, in the same quarter of 2002, Apple shipped 808,000 Macs, so the 2003 figure was actually a 4.6% decrease. And the quarter before that? 711,000 Macs-- again, no mention of the year before, but a little digging reveals that in 2002 it had been 813,000 Macs shipped, and so last year's numbers were a 12.5% decrease.

So-- time to put all this together. First of all, you may have noticed that Apple's quarterly unit shipments don't add up to IDC's at all. IDC says 1,675,000; total up the numbers from Apple's individual calendar-2003 quarterly results and you get 3,098,000. We have no idea why this is; maybe IDC doesn't include education sales or something like that. MacNN reports that "IDC counts shipments to distribution channels and end users, inclusively." Maybe Apple counts something else. Who knows? all we can say is, we're reasonably confident that Apple knows how many freakin' Macs Apple shipped each quarter. For all we know, IDC gets its numbers from the nightly Lotto drawing.

Now look at Apple's growth for each calendar quarter of last year, as compared to the same quarter the year before. From January through March, unit shipments shrunk by 12.5%. Not good. From April through June, they shrunk again-- but this time, only by 4.6%. That's better. From July through September, they finally grew by a respectable 7%. And to close out the year, from October through December they grew by 12%. Notice a trend? It's a good one, isn't it?

And heck, even look at the number of Macs shipped in each quarter moving forward: 711K, 771K, 787K, and 829K. See that? They go up every quarter. Neat, huh? That didn't happen in 2002, when the numbers (according to Apple) were 813K, 808K, 734K, and 743K; they shrunk every quarter until they started to tick upwards again right at the end of the year. And if you go by Apple's numbers, the company shipped just as many Macs in 2002-- 3,098,000-- as it did in 2003. So, no growth when you look at it as year-by-year (similar to the teensy 4,000-Mac year-over-year decline that IDC reported), but quarter-by-quarter it looks to us like Apple had a terrific 2003, with both sequential growth in raw sales and accelerating growth percentage-wise when each quarter is compared to the same one the year before.

Okay, no more math; time for the qualitative wrap-up. What's all this mean? To us it means that Apple picked up steam throughout 2003, releasing more and more must-have products as the year went on. It went from shrinkage to growth, improving consistently in every single quarter. So when IDC says that Apple's total 2003 shipments shrunk a bit compared to its total the year before, we're not even remotely worried, because as always, the real question is this: "What have you done for me lately?" And lately, it seems like Apple's doing pretty darn well.

 
SceneLink (4447)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 1/15/04 episode:

January 15, 2004: There's a whole slew of Mac music software coming down the pike; prepare to get jiggy with it. Meanwhile, Corel cancels Mac development of Corel Graphics Suite, and IDC reports that Apple's Mac shipments declined in 2003 compared to 2002-- but the quarter-by-quarter numbers tell a much more positive story...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4445: "The Hiiiiills Are Aliiiive..." (1/15/04)   Oooo, wow-- pretty slow news day, wasn't it? We kept waiting for something exciting to happen, but by around 10 PM Eastern we'd started to despair; historically speaking, most arrests of high-tech CEOs for drunkenly inciting a food riot in the aisles of a Circle K happen before 6 PM local time, so apparently Steve wasn't going to help us make with the drama...

  • 4446: And Another One Down (1/15/04)   Okay, so as Mac users, we're now (or soon will be) swimming in new music software; how about some sweet, sweet sugar for the pixel-pushers out there? Well, sadly, the news on the graphics software front is sort of going in the other direction: faithful viewer mrmgraphics tipped us off to a Macworld UK article which reveals that CorelDraw Graphics Suite is now officially kaput for the Mac...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).