Oh, Just Call It Xbox PiPPiN (2/3/04)
SceneLink
 

Hey, so you're all probably sick to death and beyond of that old standby plot element of Michael Dell's insane obsession with copying Steve Jobs's every move, right? Well, don't worry, we're not dragging that old chestnut out again. Instead, just for variety's sake, we thought we'd go for something even older and more clichéd-- like, say, the fact that Bill Gates is copying Steve's every move. And before you ask, why, yes-- we do be kickin' it old school.

As you all know, Bill's Stevulation usually stands in sharp contrast to Mr. Dell's because it's generally done on a business level (e.g. that whole little thing about Windows kindasorta trying to be a low-rent version of the Mac GUI) and not a personal one. In other words, it's typically more of a "Microsoft copies Apple" thing than a "Bill copies Steve" deal, although there are notable exceptions, like that time Bill wore a black turtleneck for a keynote address, or when he totally stole the whole digital hub concept for another keynote. This time around, though, the copycat move seems to split the difference: faithful viewer James Topoleski notes that, according to the Mercury News, Microsoft's sequel to the Xbox game console will be dubbed the "Xbox Next" and will pack three G5 processors under the hood.

Now, before we get into the whole thing about how NeXT was Steve's post-Apple company that got bought by Apple, we should probably mention that while everyone and his grandmother is reporting that the Xbox Next will use G5 processors, the Merc doesn't exactly say that. The actual article states that the console will have "three IBM-designed 64-bit microprocessors" and that "earlier versions of these PowerPC chips are used in Apple Computer's high-end G5 Power Mac machines now." Maybe we're being overly cautious, here, but to us, that just says that the Xbox Next will use some sort of PowerPC (probably a custom-designed specialty chip kind of like the PowerPC variant in Nintendo's GameCube), and not necessarily a G5 like the ones Apple is shipping today. So don't go all nutzoid about how Microsoft is going to ship a triple-processor G5 system at probably a tenth of the current price of Apple's dual-processor Power Macs. (Unless, of course, you really want to.)

Still, the Xbox Next will use some sort of PowerPC, which is enough for make a case for blatant Microsoft copycatism. (And oh, yeah-- don't forget that NeXT was Steve's post-Apple company that got bought by Apple. We promised we'd mention that.) One might take this as a ringing Redmond endorsement of IBM's PowerPC architecture over Intel's so-old-it's-begging-for-death x86 platform. On a related note, James also made an interesting point: since the current Xbox is x86-based, the real reason why Microsoft bought Virtual PC might have been so the PowerPC-based Xbox Next can retain backwards compatibility with existing Xbox games. That's not a given, yet, but it makes sense to us. And while we'd like to think that the Xbox Next being PowerPC-based might make the prospect of an emulator for the Mac a possibility, we haven't exactly been flooded with GameCube emulators, so whatever.

What's more, the Merc also reports that "Microsoft has begun developing game prototypes, and it is using G5 systems to do so." And you wondered what all those Microsoft-bound G5s (the ones that got that photographer fired) were for. See? The age-old practice of ripping off Apple's moves is alive and well in Redmond. And that'll just have to hold you until Mike Dell announces the Digital Jukebox mini, available in five colors and totally lacking in shame.

 
SceneLink (4485)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 2/3/04 episode:

February 3, 2004: Apple releases new versions of Safari and Java-- to Panther users, anyway. Meanwhile, reports fly that Microsoft's "Xbox Next" will be powered by three G5 chips, and we aren't the only ones wondering if Steve Jobs announced the Disney-Pixar split last week to try to get CEO Michael Eisner fired...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4484: "It's Like A Whole New Web!" (2/3/04)   Friends, has your Internet experience lost that certain spark? Did you once surf with a spring in your clicking finger and a grin on your face, only to find that you're now surfing sans verve-- even to your once-favorite sites? Are pages that once put a wiggle in your tush now coming across as limp, lifeless, and lacking luster? Sounds like you might be suffering from... BROWSER BURNOUT....

  • 4486: Sneaky; Slimy; Effin' Brilliant (2/3/04)   Check it out-- we're not the only ones wearing tin foil conspiracy hats! Remember last week when we reported that Pixar and Disney had called it quits? At the time, we had noted that Steve's timing with his announcement was interesting, to say the least; after ten months of negotiations and with almost another two years left in the current Disney-Pixar contract, Steve decided to tell the world about Disney's imminent Pixarlessness just a few days after former Disney directors Stan Gold and Roy Disney called for shareholders to toss CEO Eisner out on his big, circular ear...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).