Oh, Sure, Blame The Brits (7/13/04)
SceneLink
 

Not that we place all that much emphasis on reality around here, of course, but when a plot development looks too good to be true, it often is. Case in point: people have been sending us the link to that "iPod as murder weapon" article for over four months now, because they didn't pick up on the (admittedly way oversubtle) satire, didn't notice that a "HeadlinedNews.com" article was being served by liquidgeneration.com, and never bothered clicking any links on the page, which would have tipped them off pretty quickly to the fact that the whole sordid "I stabbed my boyfriend 80 times with my iPod" story was fake, fake, fake.

Sometimes it's not only the overtly fake stories that are untruthful, however. Faithful viewer Andy Van Buren sent us a Reuters article which was practically tailor-made for an AtAT plot line; it reports that "Britain's Ministry of Defence has become the latest organization to add the iPod to its list of high-tech security risks" and has "banned" the device from "most sections of its headquarters in the UK and abroad." Perfect, right? It builds nicely upon last week's scene about that Gartner report which cautioned businesses of the dangers of wanton employee iPod use behind corporate firewalls, and also plays right into the long-running theme of Apple dissing the UK and the UK dissing right back. And anything Apple-related to do with the military is just begging for a tie-in with Steve Jobs's master plan for world domination.

The thing is, though, the "UK military bans iPods" story is apparently nothing but hooey; faithful viewer Ged Smith pointed out a BBC News article which reports that "the Ministry of Defence has denied reports that it has banned Apple's iPod." While it's true that the MoD has "some areas where portable storage devices would not be allowed" (and we would sure freakin' hope so, seeing as it's the military, for crying out loud), a spokesperson for the Ministry "insisted that iPods are welcomed," and that the Ministry has "a flexible management approach in regards to iPods and similar devices that can move data from official systems. In each area, the risks are assessed and, when appropriate, measures are taken to mitigate that risk. There is not a case that there is an outright ban on these."

So there you have it: British military personnel are indeed allowed to rock out after all. Apparently we're just going to have to wait for another story with a high drama quotient to come along. Well, either that or we suppose we could just do a scene about how the proposed "no 'Pods for MoD" plot point turned out to be false, but we'd have to be pretty jaded and sleep-deprived to pull something like that.

 
SceneLink (4816)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 7/13/04 episode:

July 13, 2004: The Macworld Expo show floor looks distressingly small, but IDG World Expo insists that it'll be held in Boston again next year. Meanwhile, rumor has it that heat issues are holding up the release of the iMac G5, and the UK's Ministry of Defence denies that it has banned iPods from its premises...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4814: "Wouldn't Change A Thing" (7/13/04)   Good news, folks: today was the first day of the actual "Expo" side of Macworld Conference & Expo, and despite widespread fears of a seriously dead show, Think Secret reports that the show floor was "crowded, vibrant, and packed with attendees"!...

  • 4815: Heat, Heat, And More Heat (7/13/04)   Look on the bright side: even if Apple had come to Boston and Steve had done one of his legendary keynote addresses, the odds are pretty good that he wouldn't have had anything new to unveil. That's not to say that he wouldn't have had plenty of solid material; a less developer-focused tour of Tiger, an onstage bake-off between a new dual 2.5 GHz Power Mac G5 and whatever the fastest Wintel thingy might be today, and a demo of AirTunes and AirPort Express would probably have all figured heavily, but the timing is such that anyone hoping for a glimpse of never-before-seen Macs might well have come away disappointed...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1252 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).