A Mini That's Not A Mini (7/14/04)
SceneLink
 

Ladies and gentlemen, the word of the day is "staggering." You probably noticed that during Apple's earnings conference call, ExecuVeep of Worldwide Sales and Operations Tim Cook used that word to describe customer demand for the miniPod-- twice. And with good reason, we figure, since availability of the shiny little gizmos is still practically nil and we've yet to meet a soul who wouldn't trade in his own grandmother if he thought it'd get him a miniPod before everyone's tooling around in flying cars. In a way, it's the right problem for Apple to have (it's better than too much supply and no demand-- or rabies, for that matter), but the fact remains that lots of people would love to give Apple loads of cash, but Apple can't produce the goods to make it happen. That there is what we in the old country used to call "missed opportunity."

Worse yet, Apple apparently doesn't expect to be able to come close to meeting miniPod demand for the foreseeable future, so given that fact, what can the company do to start turning some of that pent-up demand into filthy lucre? Answer: channel some of that miniPod lust into a product that Apple can ship. In other words, Apple needs to make the vanilla iPod more appealing-- and less vanilla. Luckily, at least one report claims that the company is doing just that; faithful viewer William Vogel alerted us to the rumor, as reported by Think Secret, that "Apple will announce new iPod models in August" that will be "smaller, sleeker, and will come in a variety of colors." Gee, now what does that description remind you of?

Yes, Apple is allegedly taking the miniPod to maxi proportions for the fourth-gen iPod; while its feature set will still outpace that of the less expensive miniPod, it'll be "more compact" than the current third-gen model, "sleeker," and "will come in a variety of new colors, expected to include purple, orange, and yellow." If that's true, then these maximiniPods will indeed stand a decent chance of drawing some of the attention-- and dollars-- away from frustrated miniPod coveters. After all, why wait another six months for a miniPod when its similarly-styled but bigger brother will be available in August? It'll cost more than a mini, granted, but an extra fifty clams or so will get you probably at least four times as much storage capacity, and you still get all of the hip aluminum styling of the miniPod, only without quite as long a blast from the Debigulator.

Now, we know what you're thinking-- making the regular iPod more like the miniPod might simply create the exact same problem again: demand will skyrocket and Apple won't be able to slap together enough iPods to satisfy it. But while that certainly could happen, we suppose, let's not forget that the bottleneck in miniPod production is the eensy-teensy hard drive that goes inside. No such drought occurs for the larger drives that go into the iPod, so Apple might just get away with this one. We'll find out soon, we suppose; August is closer than you think.

 
SceneLink (4818)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 7/14/04 episode:

July 14, 2004: Apple posts a $61 million profit for its highest-revenue third quarter in eight years. Meanwhile, rumor has it that the iPod may be inheriting a very miniPod-like look and feel, and Macworld Expo Boston was small, just not that small...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4817: Getting Better All The Time (7/14/04)   Looks like we can chalk up one more Street-beating quarter for Apple, folks. Since we were stuck in post-Expo traffic, we didn't actually get to listen to the Q3 conference call live, but we finally had a chance to tune in to the QuickTime rebroadcast, and the financial state that Apple described is so rosy you'd swear it's been hitting the sauce...

  • 4819: "Where's The Rest Of It?" (7/14/04)   Okay, one more scene on Macworld Expo Boston and then we'll shut up about it, we promise. It's just that after months and months of hearing how small and lame the Apple-free version of the show would be, we finally got to check it out first-hand today, so we thought we'd share our perspective on the situation...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).