Gravity Finally Steps In? (12/2/04)
SceneLink
 

Attention investors: beware falling prices! Apple's atomic stock price explosion couldn't last forever, and we've just gotten the first potential sign that the party might be over: an actual, honest-to-goodness analyst downgrade. That's right, folks, one of the suits on Wall Street is officially recommending that his clients not buy any more AAPL-- and shares subsequently dipped by a tough-to-ignore $2.58 in regular trading. Is this the beginning of the end?

Well, maybe, but to us it looks more like the end of the beginning. As far as downgrades go, Apple picked up just about the best one it could possibly dream of; according to CBS MarketWatch, Smith Barney's Richard Gardner "raised his 2005 and 2006 earnings estimates" for Apple by about an extra $68 million in sheer profit per year "due to the outlook for iPod and iMac sales," which he apparently expects to be rosy for the next two years at least. In addition, he bumped his price target on AAPL from the oh-so-passé $60 a share to a slightly less out-of-date $75. In other words, Gardner thinks Apple will be making more and more money for at least the next two years on strong demand for hot products, and expects the stock price to go up another ten bucks within a year. So heaven forbid that any of his clients actually buy any or anything.

Yes, despite all the happy talk about increased earnings, two years of growth, and a stock price that he still thinks will rise, Gardner has cut his rating on AAPL from "Buy" to "Hold," which constitutes the first analyst downgrade on the stock since September (and that one had been the first since January-- of last year). Which is odd on the face of it, since, generally speaking, when an analyst thinks a stock is going to go up, you'd probably expect him to tell you to buy it. So what gives?

Well, apparently it's like this: since AAPL's price has "doubled in value over the last four months," Gardner figures it's grown a little faster than reality might otherwise warrant. So while Apple the company is, in fact, doing extremely well and will probably earn a share price in the $75 area within the next twelve months, that's little enough of a boost that he "can no longer recommend that medium- to long-term investors place new money into the shares." So it'll make investors money, just not enough.

What's more, he thinks that AAPL is due for one of those "corrections" that'll knock a chunk of change off the price before it starts to climb upwards again. In other words, he says that shareholders might want to cash out before the price tumbles and then buy their shares back at bargain basement prices later. As TheStreet.com quotes him: "while we do not see negative catalysts between now and year-end, our valuation work suggests that clients should use strength between now and January to take profits." Well, gee, here's a negative catalyst for ya, Richard: how about an analyst downgrade that triggers a $2.58 drop in the share price? Didja see that one coming? Huh? Didja?

For what it's worth, Gardner's not the only one saying that AAPL's recent Run o' Glory is winding to a close; CNN/Money is also suggesting that investors "cash in on gains" despite Apple's "great prospects," noting that "several institutional investors are starting to sell even though they still think Apple's fundamentals are strong." The good news, of course, is that no one's expecting another full-on power-dive that Apple will need four years from which to recover-- at least, not unless we see a lot more downgrades in the days to come, and that would never happen. Right? Right?

 
SceneLink (5075)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 12/2/04 episode:

December 2, 2004: AAPL dips on the most positive analyst downgrade we've ever seen. Meanwhile, Gartner predicts that three of the top ten PC vendors will exit the market within three years, and Apple follows up the iTunes Affiliate Program with a .Mac counterpart...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 5076: And Then There Were Seven (12/2/04)   Now that the iTunes Music Store has finally made it to Canada and Apple can go back to being preoccupied with selling a few gazillion more iPods, things are a little quiet again, so how about we drop back and punt with the Agatha Christie-style drama of Ten Little PC Vendors?...

  • 5077: Spend! Right Now! HURRY! (12/2/04)   Well, apparently the iTunes Affiliate Program has been deemed a rousing success-- and maybe the .Mac referral discount scheme not so much-- because now Apple is enlisting web site owners to help them rack up .Mac subscribers, too...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).