Evidence Of... Something (12/9/04)
SceneLink
 

Geez, we pass along one single little rumor that hovers deliciously on the edge of complete incredibility, and suddenly our inbox explodes. Great. Now who's going to clean up this mess? Thanks to you guys, there's spam in our hair. Do you have any idea how much Herbal Essences it's going to take to wash out the smell of ham and pork shoulder?

Yup, it seems like the "screenless flashPod" rumor is the controversy of choice this week, because as far as we can tell from reading a selection of the kajillion-and-a-half messages now peppering the walls and strewn a foot deep all over the floor (don't even ask about the paper cuts on our faces; who knew email had such sharp edges?), people have some strong opinions one way or the other, with roughly 60 percent insisting that the very notion that Apple would ship an iPod without the celebrated iPod user interface is pure hokum. Several people figure that if it exists at all, the feature-reduced, screenless, nonscrollable iPod that looks and functions like a remote control may in fact be-- dun dun dun DUNNNNNNN!-- a remote control (funny how we never saw that coming), most likely for AirPort Express, which desperately needs one before AirTunes will really take off.

The rest of the naysayers go so far as to deny any possibility of an Apple-branded flash-based player at all, citing as evidence Steve Jobs's incessant derision of the whole class of products every time he opens his mouth. (Seriously, every time. We actually have him on tape ordering at Jamba Juice saying "Yeah, I'll have a PowerBoost, double up on the strawberries, hold the raspberries, and flash players suck.") But if that's really the situation, then what's up with that analyst at Thomas Weisel who swore up and down that Apple had signed on with SigmaTel for a whole mess o' flash-player controller chips? Well, considering he was also "pretty confident" that the flashPod would ship in time for the Christmas buying season, maybe it's not so hard to write him off after all.

But wait! Now's there's another report of flashPod parts set to come streaming into Apple's manufacturing facilities, and this time it's the flash RAM itself: according to an article in China Daily pointed out by faithful viewer Bob Martinez, Toshiba is set to start selling flash memory to Apple "early next year," and the info comes not from "sources close to the company," but instead straight from the lips of a senior executive veep at Toshiba itself-- one with an actual name and everything. Of course, just because Apple's buying a boatload of flash memory from Toshiba doesn't necessarily mean that said memory is going to be used in flash-based iPods; it could instead, for example, be used in new Newtons. You can decide for yourself which is more likely.

Now, refresh our memories, here: is this the part where we put a damper on the whole "the Toshiba deal clearly means flashPods are coming!" party by reminding everyone that every iPod in existence has 32ish MB of flash RAM inside for use in battery-saving song buffering and skip protection, and that Toshiba may simply be a new vendor supplying parts for the very same iPods we already know and love? Because we can't find our script under all this mail...

 
SceneLink (5090)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 12/9/04 episode:

December 9, 2004: Even if Apple isn't making flash-based iPods, it's got to be doing something with the flash memory it just bought from Toshiba. Meanwhile, rumors of the iPhone get a boost thanks to the whispers of a mysterious stranger on a train, and new research implies that laptop use can cause infertility in men-- which is just how the personal computer industry wants it...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 5091: Hang On, My iPod's Ringing (12/9/04)   Speaking of wild 'n' wacky 'n' possibly totally baseless rumors (and c'mon, you know you love 'em), Apple might conceivably be buying a ton of flash RAM from Toshiba for something other than a new iPod-- and no, we're not going to raise the specter of the Newton again...

  • 5092: A Slightly Sensitive Subject (12/9/04)   As partial fulfillment of court-ordered community service hours we got stuck with following an unfortunate incident involving a Dell mall kiosk last March (yes, it was us holding the flamethrower, but we swear we thought the safety was on), we close this episode with a public service announcement to all the virile young men out there: keep those PowerBooks off your laps, fellas, because the latest medical research implies a connection between laptop use and infertility in males...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).