World's Coolest Backpack (12/14/04)
SceneLink
 

Apple's said to be putting the finishing touches on a lower-capacity, flash-based iPod to appeal to customers with not much money and not much music, but what about those customers with more money than God and a CD collection with its own noticeable gravitational pull? Because while we were surprised by the number of letters we got from viewers upset with Apple for putting 60 GB drives only in the iPod photo (because they needed all that space for music, didn't mess with digital photography, and didn't want to pay $100 extra for a color screen and photo features they'd never use), we're flat-out flabbergasted by how many people have since been asking when Apple's going to get around to releasing an 80 GB iPod, or even a 100 GB one, because 60 GB just won't cut it.

Now, we're certainly not going to claim that it's impossible to have 80 GB of music, or even 80 GB of legal music; even at 128 kbps, that's what, roughly 2,000 albums? That's a lot, sure, but it's totally within the realm of possibility for a music lover. (Heck, if you collect David Bowie discs, you're practically halfway there.) And a serious music lover willing to shell out crazy ducats for a ridiculously roomy iPod is probably far more likely not to be encoding his or her music at anything as low as 128 kbps anyway. For total quality freaks, an 80 GB iPod could probably store something like 400 albums in pristine Apple Lossless format. Suddenly the whole prospect starts to sound a little more reasonable, right?

Note that we said a little more reasonable; there's still something just a wee bit sick about an iPod packing as much storage as the top-of-the-line Power Mac from just three years back-- or, for that matter, today's entry-level Power Mac G5. But there's no doubt it'll happen eventually, although we've got some bad news for the impatient pocket audiophiles out there: it's going to be a while. Faithful viewer mrmgraphics sent us an article from The Mac Observer reporting that Toshiba, Apple's current iPod drive supplier of choice, has formally announced an iPod-friendly 1.8-inch drive with an 80 GB maximum capacity. Unfortunately, it won't hit mass production until "July of next year," so for at least the next six months, you're just going to have to struggle on with the measly 60 GB you've got now. We know, we know, life's a grind. Deal with it.

So, 80 GB next summer, most likely. We've actually heard from people claiming to own dedicated iTunes servers with half a terabyte of music just looking for an iPod burly enough to handle it. Sorry, folks, but the best you're going to do in the short term to take that collection with you is to strap an Xserve on your back and plug it into a Really Long Extension Cord™. But check back in a year or six, mmmkay?

 
SceneLink (5101)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 12/14/04 episode:

December 14, 2004: Apple disables RealNetworks's "Harmony" software that allows Rhapsody songs to be played on an iPod. Meanwhile, the folks behind the Grammys work to allow voting members to listen to nominated songs for free at the iTunes Music Store, and if you're waiting for an 80 GB iPod, prepare to wait a bit longer...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 5099: Insert Chase Scene Here (12/14/04)   Slip on the beer goggles, folks, because things between Apple and RealNetworks are starting to get ugly. We won't delve into the whole backstory here, because you've no doubt heard it a kajillion times before, but the short version is that RealNetworks wanted to license Apple's FairPlay Digital Rights Management architecture so it could sell iPod-compatible songs, Apple refused, and eventually back in July RealNetworks released Harmony, software that more or less brute-forces Real's songs onto the iPod without Apple's permission...

  • 5100: Kickin' It New School (12/14/04)   Let's be clear about something, here: while we have a personal stake in the Emmys (though, for some reason, we've never been nominated) and the Oscars always make our hearts go pitter-pat, we here at the AtAT compound have about as much interest in the Grammy Awards as we do in, say, eating road tar with a spoon...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).