What Was The Middle Thing? (4/28/05)
SceneLink
 

So Mac OS X Tiger's officially out the door and kicking heinie, but we admit that we're a little confused: just what is its connection with Apple, anyway? Because judging by the name, it's clearly a product of TigerDirect, that catalog reseller who, evidently, also creates Macintosh operating systems. So is Apple just cross-promoting it for TigerDirect, or did TigerDirect buy Apple recently during one of our voyages off-world and we just completely missed the news? We're sure there must be a simple explanation, but so far it eludes us.

Oh, wait-- here's a possibility: maybe only the thickest-skulled nimrods on the planet could ever possibly think that just because Mac OS X 10.4 is marketed as "Tiger" that it's somehow connected with those guys at TigerDirect-- and even then only if said nimrods had eaten lead paint chips for breakfast for thirty years and had recently been beaten savagely about the head with the Clueless Stick. Nevertheless, that hasn't stopped TigerDirect from-- ready for this?-- filing a lawsuit against Apple for using the "Tiger" name. Really, folks, does it get any better than this? If courtroom drama were Soylent Green, this Tiger suit would be the kind made from rich people who had a lot of class.

Here's the skinny on the sitch so far: according to a MacMinute article pointed out by faithful viewer Alan Graves, TigerDirect alleges that by naming Mac OS X 10.4 "Tiger," Apple infringed upon its trademark and has caused "perceived confusion between the products now being marketed by Apple under the 'Tiger' brand." Therefore, TigerDirect has actually asked a judge for a temporary injunction to prevent Apple from shipping copies of Tiger-- or at least to prevent it from marketing it in its allegedly "confusing" manner. You've really got to wonder about a company that waits until the day before a product comes out to file for a temporary injunction blocking its release. Mac OS X Tiger was first shown publicly, what, almost a whole year ago, right? So what's with the eleventh-hour injunction crap?

Now, this may seem like the grandpappy of all dumbass lawsuits, but believe it or not, TigerDirect actually has what may be a valid legal point: Apple has a "Tiger Center" at the Apple Store, which is more or less using the "Tiger" name in conjunction with an online store which sells the same sort of stuff that TigerDirect sells. (TigerDirect's parent company has "Tiger" registered as a trademark for "mail order catalog services featuring computers and computer related products.") Whether or not having a page on Apple's site referred to as the "Tiger Center" constitutes infringement or could actually lead to customer confusion among any sampling of consumers with sufficient cranial capacity to tell the difference between, say, a live echidna and a pound of ground beef with two dozen pencils stuck into it is a matter for a judge to decide. Somehow we don't see it amounting to much, though.

And apparently the judge agrees, since Tiger is now flowing freely in retail outlets everywhere and there's still a "Tiger Center" at the Apple Store, so evidently no injunction was granted-- which means that the judge doesn't think much of TigerDirect's chances of eventually emerging victorious. It ought to be fun to watch the fireworks until they fizzle, though.

Wait, who makes Mac OS X Tiger, again?

 
SceneLink (5243)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 4/28/05 episode:

April 28, 2005: Catalog reseller TigerDirect sues Apple for trademark infringement and seeks a preliminary injunction on the eve of Mac OS X Tiger's release. Meanwhile, the chips in the new Power Macs are the same as the chips in the old Power Macs (but Tiger hints that better ones aren't far off), and iPod theft on subways is so bad that cities are putting up ads warning iPods users and creating new crime categories just to track the 'Pod-jackings...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 5244: Power Mac: 4 Cores Or Bust (4/28/05)   Heads up, folks, because we're in a petulant mood; we'll serve no whine before it's time... and boy howdy, is it ever time! Like we said before, what with chunks of our archaic Quicksilver dual G4 falling off at regular intervals, we're definitely in the market for a new Power Mac-- but before placing an order we decided to wait a couple of days to see whether the new G5s are really as underwhelming as a first glance at the specs suggests...

  • 5245: iPods + Subways = Theft (4/28/05)   Think we're above recycling an old plotline? Then you're new around here, aren't you? Consider this: we've covered the epidemic of subway iPod theft at least twice-- once to discuss the phenomenon occurring in London, and then a year later to address the same problem in New York...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).