Newtonian Resurrection? (4/2/98)
SceneLink
 

Well, how about that? Just because Apple has no faith in the recently-Steved Newton platform doesn't mean that others out there don't think it's worth saving. Planet Computing of Austin, TX is a small developer of software for handheld computers who says they made an offer to buy the Newton from Apple some three weeks ago, but it seems Apple's not selling. A PCWeek article has the details.

According to Planet, after receiving the offer, Apple "asked for the moon," whatever that implies, though they haven't actually made a written counteroffer yet. Regardless, an Apple spokeswoman claims that they'd consider selling Newton "if an attractive value is presented." Er, forgive us if we're being a tad dense, but what constitutes an "attractive offer," we wonder? After all, Apple's ceased development of the platform, so selling it for any price sounds like a profit. Granted, we wouldn't like to see it get sold for twenty bucks and a pack of gum, but we'd downgrade the requirement of an "attractive" offer to that of a "reasonable" one. (Of course, what Apple considers "reasonable" is anybody's guess, but we're willing to bet it's quite a lot higher than what most people would accept.)

Now, why would Apple be hesitant to unload Newton? Could it be that they still harbor some hope or plan of resurrecting the platform when they're on better financial footing? Or, more likely, they plan to strip-mine the Newton OS for facets to use in the upcoming "thin client" version of the Mac OS, which will run on new Apple handhelds in 1999. But if neither of these is the case and Apple's just clutching for the sake of clutching, we'd like to see them do the right thing by their Newton customers and sell the technology off to someone who will continue to develop and support it. Imagine-- maybe Planet would release a Pilot-sized Newton. Now that would make us smile.

 
SceneLink (591)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 4/2/98 episode:

April 2, 1998: The Quicktime distribution license fee waiver requirements are considerably goofier than we had erroneously thought. Meanwhile, a small outfit in Austin, TX makes a bid for Apple's recently-buried Newton technology, and the New York Times spouts a colorful fountain of FUD, right on schedule...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 590: Definition of Overkill (4/2/98)   Seems we made a mistake in yesterday's episode when we stated that the distribution license fees for Quicktime 3.0 were reasonable, especially considering that the fee is waived if the installer software installs a promo movie that hawks the upgrade to Quicktime Pro...

  • 592: Hurray, Back To Normal (4/2/98)   Oy vey, just when it looked like the default Apple-bashing in the media might finally have passed, along comes the New York Times, otherwise known as "Old Faithful" among those who are familiar with its record of Mac-slamming...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).