AOL Cookie "Hoax?" (10/13/97)
SceneLink
 

Many of you have probably received a copy of that chain email letter going around warning people that AOL 4.0 for Windows is a huge security hole. Predictably, AOL claims that the warning is a hoax.

If you were one of the six people on the planet who didn't receive a copy, the letter, ostensibly penned by two former AOL programmers, claimed that there was intentional code in the new software that stores a "cookie" on the user's hard drive. However, this isn't a "cookie" in the normal irritating Netscape sense-- this is a cookie from hell that renders your personal files and finances openly accessible to Steve Case and his cronies. The letter certainly reads like the typical internet hoax, and the rational mind finds it both technically and logistically unlikely that AOL would pull something quite this heinous, so most people are accepting that it's all just another net myth, like the "Good Times" virus.

Of course, we know the real story: BIG FAT CONSPIRACY!! After all, we are talking about the same AOL who quietly doubled their standard monthly rate by default (for "unlimited access" that no one could penetrate the busy signals to use); who planned to quietly reverse their written privacy policy and give members' phone numbers to their telemarketer buddies; and who, despite being the online service with the highest SPAM-to-content email ratio on the planet, even went so far as to consider putting advertisements in the body of every email message sent or received. Heck, if you told us that AOL was going to start requiring members to be fitted with surigically-implanted tracking devices to monitor their offline shopping patterns, we wouldn't even blink.

 
SceneLink (81)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 10/13/97 episode:

October 13, 1997: (Sorry—this was before we started writing intro text for each episode!)

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 80: The M$ing of Apple (10/13/97)   A scant two days after we mentioned an example of the outrageous cost of Microsoft support, Apple goes and declares they are adopting the same model: free web-based support (woo-hoo), free automated phone support (yippee), free phone support for the first 90 days of ownership (huzzah), and $35 a call for phone support thereafter...

  • 82: Rumors "Server Outage" (10/13/97)   While we're on the subject of conspiracy theories, we're all a little nervous here at AtAT. After all, a scant two days after Mac OS Rumors dropped the top-secret bomb that Oracle and UMAX were going head-to-head to buy out/merge with Apple, their site is unreachable due to "continuing server troubles." Yeah, right...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).