Mini-Redmond Justice (7/18/99)
SceneLink
 

Still going through "Redmond Justice" withdrawal? Hey, who can blame you? After all, the day-to-day drama of the courtroom testimony was simply enthralling; the verbal thrust and parry, the mind games, the tearful confessions, the on-the-stand suicide attempts-- well, you get the point. So yeah, we miss the daily antitrust battle between Microsoft and the government, too, and we admit that it's going to be tough waiting out the weeks before the next installment. In the meantime, though, modern technology has provided us with a minor miracle. It's Mini-Redmond Justice-- identical to the real show in every way, but one-eighth the size.

If, like us, you were too wrapped up in the government's case to notice Microsoft's other antitrust suit filed by a tiny company named Bristol Technologies, hey, don't beat yourself up about it; no one can watch everything on TV. (Believe us, we've tried.) So here's the skinny: Bristol apparently makes software that lets people run Windows software on the Unix platform. To make this product, they licensed the Windows source code from Microsoft. Then, once Microsoft managed to carve out a decent and growing market for the Unix-challenging Windows NT, they allegedly denied Bristol access to NT source code in an attempt to kill Wind/U and encourage migration from Unix to NT. At least, that's what Bristol says. Microsoft apparently didn't "deny" Bristol access to the software, though they did raise their licensing price significantly. However, other companies reportedly pay the higher license fee and consider it a fair price...

Regardless, we're coming in at the end. The trial's over, and after two days of deliberation, the jury found that "Microsoft did not commit antitrust violations," according to a CNET article. Bristol was looking to get $263 million, but instead they got a whopping $1. (See, the jury did side with Bristol on one count, and found that Microsoft had violated a Connecticut unfair trade law.) Microsoft's pretty happy, of course, but the buzz is that the outcome of this case should have no bearing on the outcome of the real "Redmond Justice," so don't start changing your bets just yet. Especially given how many points the government managed to score off Microsoft's legal team throughout the trial... Guess we'll know next year sometime, provided the sides don't settle first.

 
SceneLink (1668)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 7/18/99 episode:

July 18, 1999: Michael Dell predicts the imminent demise of one of the top five computer manufacturers even as Steve Jobs patiently plots his revenge. Meanwhile, is a Disney-Apple deal involving MyApple.com slated for a Macworld appearance? And Microsoft mostly wins its antitrust case... (No, not that antitrust case-- the other one.)

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 1666: Call Me Ishmael. (7/18/99)   It's no secret that Steve Jobs has what some might call a vengeful streak. Witness, for example, how completely he obliterated the entire Newton project (despite his voiced attraction to the eMate)-- is there much doubt that the primary motive behind the axing was the Newton's association with former CEO and Jobs-firer Sculley?...

  • 1667: Last-Minute Guesses (7/18/99)   Hey, it's Expo week-- you have to expect some final speculation about the Jobs keynote. We realize you're probably sick to death of the whole rumor mill by now, given how much overtime it's been putting in lately, but we promise we'll leave the seriously overdone subject-- the P1-- alone for now...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1246 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).