"We're Suing... Somebody." (8/3/00)
SceneLink
 

Wouldn't you know it? Yesterday we mourned the recent lack of interesting happenings in the world of Apple, and the signal had barely left our studios before Steve decided to make us look bad. Faithful viewer Tony Misasi alerted us to Apple Legal's latest exciting foray into the wild and woolly world of intellectual property litigation, and this time it's not about cheesy-looking iMac knockoffs. A two-sentence company press release is short on details, but paints the broad strokes: "Apple today filed a lawsuit in the Superior Court for Santa Clara County, California against an unknown individual who has posted Apple's trade secret information on the Internet." In other words, the War on Rumors has escalated, and Apple's taking the battle to the courtroom. Hold on tight, because this could get ugly.

Of particular dramatic note is the curious fact that Apple is suing an unknown individual. When reading about the suit in the original Reuters bulletin, we assumed that "unknown" meant "unknown to Reuters"-- in other words, "known to, but undisclosed by, Apple." But as faithful viewer Alex was quick to point out, it's even weirder than that; Apple honestly doesn't know who the culprit is. The company has indeed filed a lawsuit against a "John Doe." We were originally going to assure you all that the target of the suit isn't anyone at AtAT, but hey, since Apple doesn't even know whom it's suing, how can we be sure? It could be anyone. It could be your grandmother! Quick, tell her to get out of the country!

Luckily, sites such as MacNN and Think Secret have unearthed all kinds of tasty details missing from Apple's terse statement. At this stage, all available evidence points to Apple's target being someone who posted "images of the Apple Pro Mouse and dual-processor G4 machines to rumor-based forums." Which rumor-based forum? Try not to die of shock; the Vegas odds are favoring AppleInsider's. It seems that a member of that posting board named "Worker Bee" did, in fact, post Pro Mouse and dual G4 pictures to the forum and a couple of GeoCities web pages, which have since been pulled down following the filing of the lawsuit. Furthermore, Yahoo! has reportedly been subpoenaed by Apple in an attempt to discover the identity of the person who opened the GeoCities accounts. So Grandma's in the clear, unless she's been frequenting the AI message boards for the past few months.

Then again, we're not all out of the woods yet; Apple's suit reportedly claims that up to twenty-four accomplices may have assisted John Doe 1 in the alleged trade secret violation. These accomplices are also "unknown," and therefore are referred to in the suit as "John Does 2 through 25." (This case already has more Does than Bambi's extended family.) But Apple's legal eagles are hard at work extracting secret identities from subpoenaed ISP info, so real names may be surfacing shortly. Bottom line? If innocent ol' Grandma asked you for help troubleshooting her dialup connection, you may very well be John Doe 15. Expect a summons shortly.


 
SceneLink (2458)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases


 

The above scene was taken from the 8/3/00 episode:

August 3, 2000: It's yet another lawsuit-- only this time, even Apple doesn't know whom it's suing. Meanwhile, delays in deliveries of dual-processor G4 systems may be due to more than just the usual production crazies, and while the G4 seems stalled out in the Megahertz Races, source say not to count it out just yet...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 2459: One For The Price Of One (8/3/00)   Anyone who's been a fan of the recurring whirlwind entertainment extravaganza known as the Stevenote knows a few things about what happens when everyone's favorite iCEO takes the stage. He's going to nurse a water bottle like it contains RDF-enhancement potion instead of good ol' H2O...

  • 2460: G4 Clock Speed: 2nd Wind (8/3/00)   For those of you who, like us, file Motorola on the Irritation List somewhere between child-proof aspirin bottles and NBC's cancellation of Freaks And Geeks (we never thought we'd say it, but thank heavens for the Fox Family Channel), word has it that we'll need to do a little list reshuffling in the not-too-distant future...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1233 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).