The 90-Second Rebuttal (12/20/97)
SceneLink
 

AtAT's learned a bit more about the next episode of "Redmond Justice," thanks to the hardy newshounds at Bloomberg News. Everyone's favorite courtroom drama may take a decidedly anti-Microsoft spin in its next installment, due to air on January 13th. At that time, Judge Jackson will preside over a hearing to determine if Microsoft should be found in contempt of court for ignoring Jackson's temporary injunction.

Apparently Jackson decided to lasso a technician and try to remove Internet Explorer from Windows 95 himself. Ninety seconds later, he had accomplished what Microsoft had claimed was well-nigh impossible-- IE was uninstalled. Did the process render Windows 95 unusable? Says Jackson, "To all appearances, Windows 95 functioned flawlessly as it was intended to operate." Now it's up to Microsoft to prove otherwise. But Microsoft's defense is that Jackson ordered all of IE removed, and what Jackson did certainly doesn't qualify. Jackson didn't order that IE just be removed from the desktop, or rendered unusable-- they were ordered to remove "the software code that Microsoft itself now separately distributes at retail as Internet Explorer." Those were his exact words.

So the central issue, then, is going to be whether Microsoft can be held in contempt for "innocently" obeying the exact letter of the temporary injunction in such a way as to completely skirt that injunction's obvious intent. They may be setting themselves up for a big-ass fall, though. I mean jeez, didn't Microsoft's lawyers ever watch the Brady Bunch? Remember when Greg weaseled out of a grounding by insisting that he was following the "exact words" of the punishment? If you ask us, Microsoft's going to end up washing Judge Jackson's car in the middle of the night. Serves them freakin' right for not watching the classics.


 
SceneLink (286)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube

 

The above scene was taken from the 12/20/97 episode:

December 20, 1997: (Sorry—this was before we started writing intro text for each episode!)

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 287: Turning Against Jobs? (12/20/97)   A scant two days before the end of our 90-day Jobs Progress Countdown, Mac OS Rumors mentions the undercurrent of dissatisfaction and impatience growing among Mac users, and especially Apple stockholders...

  • 288: One War is Over (12/20/97)   What the?!... Okay, what's up with Microsoft and SGI collaborating on a new 3D API, code-named "Fahrenheit?" We just read about this over at MacCentral, and it just doesn't sound possible. Microsoft's Direct3D vs...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1233 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).