So Are We Settled, Then? (11/1/01)
SceneLink
 

From a purely rational standpoint (or, at least, as close as we ever get to such a thing), we can't say we're all that surprised that "Redmond Justice" is now probably mere hours away from one seriously anticlimactic final episode. After all, the new judge had given Microsoft and the Justice Department a deadline of tomorrow by which to arrive at a settlement, and the new Bush-era DoJ has reportedly been far less interested in smacking down Redmond than its predecessor was. Still, though, the fact that former settlement talks had always been utter wastes of time gave us a glimmer of hope that maybe this case would be headed back to court for another round of high drama.

Alas, though, it appears that further conflict is not to be; faithful viewer dzhim! forwarded us an Associated Press article which indicates that Microsoft and the DoJ have actually reached a "tentative" settlement deal. Sadly, we have no idea what the terms of that agreement might be, though the very fact that Microsoft is willing to accept them implies to us that the deal seriously lacks teeth. In all likelihood, after nearly four years of bitter struggle at the taxpayers' expense, despite having proven that Microsoft both wields and abuses monopoly power (the Supreme Court declined to hear the case, so Microsoft's out of appeals on that front), it looks like the feds are preparing to roll over and deal Bill and the gang a slap on the wrist.

Indeed, one of the proposed settlement terms kicked around over the past few days involves "letting Microsoft add new features into its flagship Windows software, but requiring the company also to offer a version that doesn't include those additions." Ooooo, stop it, you're scaring us. So Microsoft can keep steamrolling competitors the same way it neutered Netscape just as long as it keeps selling, say, Windows 3.1 as well as Windows XP 2 ("Now With Integrated Office™!!")? Man, Bill must be shaking in his boots. This might turn out to be almost as bad for him as that earlier 1995 consent decree that forced him to change his ways so he couldn't bundle IE with Windows, drive a competitor out of business, and prompt yet another federal antitrust lawsui-- uh, yeah.

But there's still a chance of drama ahead; the state attorneys general are still reviewing the terms of the settlement, and if they don't sign on, they'll fight on without the feds. So we'll see what happens come tomorrow. At this point, though, we're expecting yet another consent decree that Microsoft can mount in a nice frame, hang on the wall of the board room next to the last one, and snicker at each morning before business as usual. But hey, the ride was fun, right?

 
SceneLink (3369)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

Mash-ups and original music by AtAT's former Intern and Goddess-in-Training

Prim M at YouTube
 

The above scene was taken from the 11/1/01 episode:

November 1, 2001: And then there were four-- four class action lawsuits against Apple, that is. Meanwhile, resourceful viewers find still more ways to justify the cost of an iPod this holiday season, and "Redmond Justice" heads into endgame as the Justice Department and Microsoft reach a "tentative" settlement agreement...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3367: Go To The Head Of The Class (11/1/01)   It's the hottest fad to sweep the nation since the hula hoop, so hurry up, lawyers, and climb on the "Let's File A Class Action Against Apple For Stock Manipulation" bandwagon! But be quick, or else you'll get branded as a pathetic legal outcast and you'll have to sit with the geeks and dweebs at lunch for the rest of your professional careers...

  • 3368: Relativity Is Your Friend (11/1/01)   Okay, complaints about its $399 price tag are still raging, so despite the fact that we at AtAT consider that to be a pretty fair price for a gadget as advanced, as useful, and as achingly gorgeous as the iPod is, we're here to present three more ways to justify the device's cost...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).