Dr. Jeckyll And Dr. Jeckyll (11/21/01)
SceneLink
 

Reality check: as much as we love Mac OS X (particularly now that the advent of version 10.1.1 means the system actually runs rather than hobbles), it's still not "the" face of the Macintosh. True, Mac OS X is preloaded on every new Mac and has been for six months, now, but the fact of the matter is that when those sparkly new Macs are pulled from their boxes, plugged in, and powered up for the first time ever, their owners will still find themselves face to face with Mac OS 9 in all its Platinum glory. Aqua-y goodness is just one quick trip to the Startup Disk control panel away-- but most novice users are going to stick with the hand they're dealt.

And, for the most part, well they should; Mac OS X compatibility continues to grow healthier with each passing day, but right now there's still a ton more software and peripherals that work with Mac OS 9 and not Mac OS X than vice-versa. Until the phrase "Mac-compatible" on a software box or a video card means "Mac OS X-compatible," Apple's going to have to ship its systems running Mac OS 9. So the question that's been on everyone's minds since the Aqua Revolution last March is this: when can we buy a new Mac, take it home, start it up, and be greeted by a Dock instead of a Control Strip?

For a company that has repeatedly assured its customers and developers that it's not pursuing a dual-OS strategy, Apple sure seems to be schitzoid on the operating system issue. The last time we walked into an Apple retail store, every Mac we looked at was running Mac OS X; every Mac that Apple sold that day, however, was configured to boot into Mac OS 9. There's sort of a Jeckyll-and-Hyde thing going on, except that since both operating systems are pretty spiffy in their own respective ways, it's more of a Jeckyll-Jeckyll arrangement. (Mr. Hyde, meanwhile, hails from Redmond.)

Some of you may recall that we got all indignant with the San Jose Mercury News last July for reporting that Mac OS X wouldn't be Apple's default operating system until April of next year; now that estimate almost seems optimistic. See, at the time we were operating under the deliriously naïve delusion that Mac OS X 10.1 would magically fix every problem under the sun, from lack of DVD playback and glacial window resizing to cancer, world hunger, and the startling increase of cat juggling. We failed to reckon with the decidedly un-speedy pace at which applications, drivers, etc. are being adapted for Mac OS X compatibility, so these days another five or six months before Mac OS X really hits the mainstream now actually sounds pretty good to us.

If you've always figured that April was a realistic-- even aggressive-- target, we've got some good news: according to the Wall Street Journal, Apple chief marketing veep Phil Schiller states that, with "over 1,900 native applications" now shipping (including Microsoft Office), the Mac OS X transition is "on track to be completed by March 2002." We're not sure exactly what constitutes the end of the "transition," but we're reasonably certain that when it's done, new Macs aren't still going to be booting into Mac OS 9. But March is only four months away, so we don't have long to wait to find out. Viva la revolución!


 
SceneLink (3409)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases


 

The above scene was taken from the 11/21/01 episode:

November 21, 2001: Phil Schiller notes that Apple's full transition to Mac OS X will conclude next March. Meanwhile, word on the street is that the iPod is a hot seller, and may get hotter before the holidays are through, and Apple announces two new promos for customers who like to get checks and merchandise in the mail...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3410: The iPod: iStockingStuffer (11/21/01)   We mentioned yesterday that we didn't have any hard numbers on how well the iPod is selling, and we still don't-- but the same Wall Street Journal article which reports that Apple is planning to complete its transition to Mac OS X by next March also quotes jolly old Phil Schiller as saying that sales of the "breakthrough" digital music player are "looking very good."...

  • 3411: It's ALWAYS 8 To 10 Weeks (11/21/01)   Trade with your friends; collect them all! Maybe you're the type who collects stamps, or coins, or bottle caps à la Bert from Sesame Street. Us? We collect Apple sales promotions. Imagine our glee, then, to find that there are two new ones to stick in the scrapbook today!...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(493 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2021 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).