Questionable Show Choices (9/9/03)
SceneLink
 

Say, is it just us, or are Apple's rejiggered priorities wreaking serious havoc with the established order of things in the Mac-centric trade show business? Of course you know all about the company's steadfast refusal to participate in next summer's Macworld Expo (ostensibly because Boston is just too much of a hole to visit, but don't forget that Apple considered pulling out of this year's summer Expo in New York as well). But did you know that Seybold-- the publishing conference that's traditionally Apple's second-biggest trade show, we reckon, at least domestically-- is Appleless, too? WIRED knows the score; without Apple as an exhibitor, the show had to "cut back on space" and "fish for other big-name exhibitors" to try to fill Apple's shoes, but still wound up "barren and sedate."

So Apple's absence is a little weird, right? Especially since Seybold is a mecca for content creators, i.e. professional Mac users, i.e. one of Apple's alleged "core markets" that's been sort of neglected for the past couple of years. It's no secret that professional sales had slipped, due in large part to a lack of Mac OS X-native creative apps and less-than-compelling performance gains in the Power Mac G4. So doesn't it strike anyone as a little odd that Apple picks now to skip Seybold? After all, with the dual 2.0 GHz Power Mac G5 now available alongside Carbonized versions of the most important Macromedia and Adobe products and the ever-elusive QuarkXPress, there's been no better time for Apple to go strut its stuff in front of the creative community. So why the no-show?

Well, since attending trade shows is obscenely expensive, we suppose it could just be all about cost-cutting, but apparently it's really just a matter of scheduling conflicts and those aforementioned priorities. See, while an Apple-free Seybold is cranking away at Moscone right now, OracleWorld is shakin' its enterprise thang at the exact same time-- and according to MacNN, Apple is both a full-fledged exhibitor and an "equipment sponsor" at the latter shindig. Hmmmm, sounds to us like Apple's newfound focus on enterprise sales led it to pick OracleWorld over Seybold. Pretty zany, huh, kids?

Then again, maybe Steve just wanted to catch Michael Dell's sure-to-be scintillating keynote address, "Enterprise Without Compromise." Steve, as you know, could really use some tips when it comes to public speaking, and ol' Mike is apparently a real master. For example, check out this excerpt from "Silvertongue" Dell's Mikenote as he explained his crutches and bum ankle (excerpt courtesy of The Register): "I was riding a horse, and the horse slipped and fell, and, of course, if you are on a horse, and the horse falls, you usually fall. The horse fell on my leg, and it didn't feel too good, but I will be alright."

Man, it's like Shakespeare. We've got goosebumps. We hope you took good notes, Steve! (By the way, AtAT sources inform us that Dell's injury wasn't from a horseriding accident at all, but rather from his keynote rehearsal, when he tried to leap around on stage screaming "GIVE IT UP FOR MEEEEE!" à la Steve Ballmer. Clearly that approach was a little too strenuous for him.)

Anyway, don't worry too much about Apple abandoning its traditional markets; the company will have a "major presence" at IBC in Amsterdam next week, where it'll focus on desktop video, and of course Apple Expo will take care of a wide cross-section of European Mac users right after that. And Apple will even target creative pros on this continent at PhotoshopWorld at the end of the month. We're still a little weirded out by the OracleWorld-over-Seybold choice, though. And why couldn't they just attend both? After all, they're taking place in the same convention center, for crying out Pete's sake-- how hard could it be? Three words: booth on wheels.

 
SceneLink (4193)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 9/9/03 episode:

September 9, 2003: The G4 in the iMac you buy next year might actually be a G3-- but don't worry, it's cool. Meanwhile, Apple bails on Seybold for-- no kidding, here-- OracleWorld, and also clarifies its position on reselling iTunes Music Store songs: you can, but why on earth would you want to?...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4192: Hijinks of G-Nomenclature (9/9/03)   You know, Apple really flooded us with plot twists in the form of eleventy-seventy press releases yesterday, so we didn't get to tackle some of the quieter things poking around in the dark corners of the Mac universe...

  • 4194: You Do It Because You CAN (9/9/03)   You thought they'd ignore it, didn'tcha? You figured that Apple would just pretend that last week's eBay auction of a song purchased from the iTunes Music Store never happened. (That's certainly what eBay's doing, at any rate.)...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)

Like K-pop, but only know the popular stuff? Expand your horizons! Prim M recommends underrated K-pop tunes based on YOUR taste!

Prim M's Playlist

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).