Format Wars: Cease Fire? (2/2/04)
SceneLink
 

Now that the Pepsi 100 million song giveaway has officially been launched, we think it's probably safe to assume that the iTunes Music Store is going to enjoy a significant increase in traffic over the next few months. There'll be more songs downloaded, more people installing and using iTunes, maybe even more iPods sold as a result. (There'll also be a lot more fizzy syrup purchased and a lot more teeth rotted away, but that's not strictly relevant. Although we can't stress enough the importance of daily flossing; have you tried Glide? Because it totally changed our lives. Seriously.)

The upshot, of course, is likely to be that the number one music download service will extend its already massive lead over what we chortlingly refer to as its "competitors" (chortle, chortle-- told you) and the iPod will retain its position at the top of the market share heap for portable players, both in units sold and cash pulled in. Oh, and don't forget about the boost Apple will get once Hewlett-Packard comes online with its bluePod and its iTunes-on-every-Wintel plan. All told, it sounds like Apple has the market nicely sewn up for at least the next eight or nine months.

But is the company resting on its laurels? Are we doomed to watch Apple get complacent and toss its lead out the window as copycat competitors churn out cheaper products and services that aren't nearly as good but are "good enough"? It'd be heartbreaking to watch Apple's digital music lead go the way of its GUI and ease-of-use lead in desktop operating systems, but with the iTMS's use of the AAC file format and proprietary Digital Rights Management code restricting native iTMS song use to iTunes and iPods only (while every other device and service climbs into Microsoft's overcrowded bed and licenses WMA), several analysts and pundits think that's exactly what's going to happen.

Personally, we get the feeling that Apple is boosting its digital music market share so strongly right now, it's actually got a decent shot of beating Microsoft at the format game. If the iPod keeps selling until it becomes ubiquitous, other music download services will either have to switch to an iPod-friendly music format or close up shop. If that happens, makers of portable players would follow suit. It's a war that Apple might conceivably win-- even though it's battling Microsoft. Crazy stuff.

Still, though, we're a little relieved to hear even questionable reports that Apple and Microsoft may be working together to resolve the WMA vs. AAC conflict before anyone gets hurt. Billboard claims that, at the behest of the music industry at large, "hardware makers and digital format developers" (including "bitter technology rivals-- most notably Microsoft and Apple") are "engaged in private talks" in hopes of improving compatibility between competing devices and services by next year. So far the talks are apparently centering on a means to convert between the protected AAC and WMA formats, which is clunky, but not nearly as clunky as burning an audio CD and re-ripping the song.

The implication is that eventually a more transparent solution might be found-- but Billboard acknowledges that, as the market share leader, Apple holds all the cards right now, and has just about zero incentive to make iTMS songs compatible with non-iPod devices. Apple makes money on iPod sales and just about loses cash on each song sale, so selling songs for other manufacturer's players would be silly. So hey, maybe the war will continue after all. Wouldn't it be nifty if Apple won this time around?

 
SceneLink (4482)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 2/2/04 episode:

February 2, 2004: The Super Bowl is over, and while there was no Apple commercial, at least you can watch the Pepsi one over and over. Meanwhile, rumor has it that Apple is working with Microsoft on compatibility between AAC and WMA, and it turns out that the G5 Athlon thingy was a hoax-- sort of...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4481: The Ugly Death Of Hope (2/2/04)   Okay, well, judging by the smoldering overturned cars in our local Boston-area streets and the shirtless, face-painted individuals passed out in doorways with grins frozen solid to their skulls while still clutching empty six-packs, we're going to take a wild, flailing stab at it and assume that the Patriots won the Super Bowl last night...

  • 4483: A Welcome Relief-- Of Sorts (2/2/04)   Fished in! Fished in!! We probably should have mentioned this on Friday just so's you wouldn't be needlessly nauseated all weekend, but whatever. We were busy; lots of tapes of "What's Happening!" to watch...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).