Tee Eye Single-Guh Er (3/31/04)
SceneLink
 

There's a lot of speculation about the as-yet-unannounced Mac OS X 10.4, which, if history is any indication, will probably first meet the public at WWDC in June. In addition to the few official tidbits Apple has already told us about the next release (such as the planned inclusion of Spoken Interface), there are all sorts of wild and not-so-wild rumors about what's going to wind up in the mix. Insane levels of G5-specific optimization? Built-in transparent compatibility with off-the-shelf Windows apps? The ability to cook hot dogs and toast their buns at the same time? Hey, whatever-- all we know is, that stuff pales in comparison to the one really important issue-- the one central to the entire Mac experience: which big cat will 10.4 be named after?

Now, we've gotten tips on the subject from folks who claim to be in the know, but we always like to wait until we can point at someone else's report as a source, just so we have someone to blame if everything falls to pieces. So now that MacRumors reports that Apple has chosen a feline moniker (and cites MacMagazine as its source-- here's a BabelFish auto-translation for the Portuguese-impaired), we can relax comfortably in a cloud of unaccountability when we say that a couple of anonymous sources told us the same name last week. Of course, we're not sure that adds any believability, since three anonymous sources told us that 10.4 would be named "Garfield." (Big cat, get it? Big... cat... oh, never mind.)

Regardless, without further ado, alduce us to introlow Apple's next major operating system release: Mac OS X 10.4, aka... TIGER.

Yes, Tiger. Which isn't actually much of a surprise, since we all knew that Apple registered Tiger as a trademark along with Cougar, Leopard, and Lynx last year, so it was pretty much a toss-up between those four. Personally, we were rooting for Cougar, because then we'd have a good excuse to broadcast iTMS links to "Pink Houses"-- but actually, we've just discovered that the iTMS's entire selection of early-'80s J.C. [Mellencamp] is sorely lacking (no "Jack and Diane"? No "Hurts So Good"? Philistines!), so Tiger's fine with us now. Although we do wish that Apple's original plan to call the release "Tigger" could have come to fruition, but with the whole Eisner-Disney flap, well, you know.

So start getting used to it now, folks, because you know that otherwise it's going to be just like writing the wrong year on all your checks from January through March (or, if you're as absent-minded as we are, September... of two years later). We recommend that you repeat the question "So have you upgraded to 'Tiger' yet?" out loud six or eight thousand times until it stops sounding weird. And if Steve struts out on stage in June and introduces Mac OS X Leopard instead, well, you'll be sorta boned... but hey, isn't it worth the risk?


 
SceneLink (4605)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases


 

The above scene was taken from the 3/31/04 episode:

March 31, 2004: IBM open-sources the PowerPC, sort of. Meanwhile, Apple's next major Mac OS X upgrade will reportedly be called "Tiger," and scads of evidence reveals that a Princeton fire was not caused by a Power Mac G4, and that the insurance company is trying to squeeze Apple for easy cash...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 4604: PowerPC, Hold The Pickles (3/31/04)   Hey, how 'bout that whole "Open Source" thingy, huh? Pretty cool, right? No doubt you're nodding vigorously in agreement right now, because what with Mac OS X's core, QuickTime's Streaming Server, Safari's rendering engine, etc., Apple is clearly digging on the benefits of Open Source these days...

  • 4606: Vindication Is Oh So Sweet (3/31/04)   A-ha! We knew something was amiss! Remember a couple of weeks ago when we told you that Apple was being sued by Princeton's insurance company because of a fire that lightly toasted (and, more the point, gently destroyed) $2 million worth of genetic lab equipment?...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1233 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).