Oh, Right-- This Again (11/29/04)
SceneLink
 

Well of course our return following a four-day food coma is late; what did you expect? As it must be painfully obvious to anyone with a pulse by now, after seven years on the air and having long expended all supplies of youthful enthusiasm and anything vaguely resembling a work ethic, this show now relies almost entirely on inertia to keep going. See, as long as it's already in motion, it can pretty much coast from one day to the next with minimal creative input from us-- heck, if we had the time, we're pretty sure we could slap together a little code and turn over the day-to-day production to a complex AppleScript.

But once it grinds to a halt for any substantial length of time, getting it moving again is like dragging a side of beef through a tar pit using only our lips and eyelids. Remember that time we were gone for eleven weeks? We actually only took two off, and then spent the next two months squeezing out a return episode. (If we recall correctly, we lost about ten days trying to come up with a better word for "lugubrious," and then lost another three trying to remember why we wanted it in the first place.)

These days, though, we're pretty lucky; Apple seems to be in a holding pattern of sorts, as the company focuses on feeding the left side of the equation "More iPods = Happier Wall Street" until that particular bubble finally pops. Today we awakened from our digestive slumbers to find that both Mac OS Rumors and Think Secret are reporting heavy holiday sales for Apple, so the rest we can practically fill in like a Mad Lib: faithful viewer mrmgraphics (who else?) tells us that, according to CBS MarketWatch, [INSERT ANALYST HERE] (in this particular case it's UBS) raised its price target for AAPL from $66 to $77, citing "a survey of U.S. retailers" showing crazy holiday shoppers snapping up iPods and iMacs like they were boxes of pizza, heroin, and open-minded but attractive naked people. Higher-than-expected holiday sales implies earnings per share for the quarter will come in closer to 46 cents per share, not 43, so party on Wayne and party on Garth.

Don't believe things are quite so cookie-cutter yet? C'mon, it's more predictable than the tides. Check it out, Merrill Lynch also upped its target-- from $61 to $78 per share, because of (you guessed it) stronger-than-anticipated holiday sales so far. Oh, and that flash-based iPod coming in January, of course. Honestly, we should have stayed in the coma and hired a bunch of monkeys with typewriters to take care of the daily "investors says good things, stock gets happier" scenes. We bet we wouldn't even need an infinite number-- just, like, seven or eight. After all, this stuff practically writes itself, and monkeys can be a lot more sarcastic than most people think.

And so we come to the inevitable "hey, look, the stock went up" part: following the price target upgrades from USB and Merrill Lynch, AAPL tippy-toed up another $3.89 today. That's 6 percent-- not too shabby. Put another way, anyone who owns a hundred shares of AAPL made just about enough on paper today to buy a 40 GB iPod; sweeeeet. In after-hours trading, AAPL was flirting ever-so-closely with Apple's highest stock price ever. So keep on grinning, investors; the stock's got nowhere to go but up!

Or down. Technically, we think it can go down, too. But keep grinning anyway-- it looks good on you.

 
SceneLink (5066)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

 

The above scene was taken from the 11/29/04 episode:

November 29, 2004: Apple rakes in still more analyst upgrades and comes close to hitting its highest stock price ever. Meanwhile, is the company refusing to sell the new Band Aid song at the iTunes Music Store, or is Universal refusing to let Apple sell it? And did a government department in the UK really try to upgrade seven PCs to Windows XP and wind up killing 60,000 more?...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 5067: Who's The Scrooge, Here? (11/29/04)   Okay, if you weren't born in the early-to-mid-'70s, just pretend like you were while we ask you this question: can you believe it's the 20th anniversary of Band Aid's first release? Man. We've still got a copy of "Do They Know It's Christmas?"-- the original, baby!-- on vinyl in a box somewhere several hundred miles west of here. Now it's two decades later, and they've put out a (vastly less-popular, apparently) redone version in the UK-- but what's this?...

  • 5068: Great Moments In "Duh" (11/29/04)   It's always a shame when one special occasion interferes with another, isn't it? Just ask anyone whose birthday happens to be within three days of Christmas how many "combined" presents they get and you'll see what we mean...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).