What He Didn't Say (9/1/98)
SceneLink
 

Apparently the Department of Justice finds Bill Gates' statements during his "Redmond Justice" deposition to be somewhat incriminating. A recent plot twist revealed Microsoft's request to have the entire case dismissed, on the basis of its appellate court victory which overturned last December's infamous preliminary injunction. Since the appeals court ruling essentially gave them the right to tie Internet Explorer to Windows, they are arguing that the government now has no case.

But the DoJ is fighting back. Despite Gates' best Ollie North impersonation during last week's deposition ("Mr. Gates, what is your relationship with the software company Microsoft?" "I don't recall-- I'd have to see the company in question before answering."), the government apparently believes that at least least some of what they could squeeze out of him is incriminating enough to warrant proceeding with the case. According to the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the government has filed a "lengthy document" that quotes Gates' deposition to support its request that Microsoft's move for dismissal be rejected. Meanwhile, the Unsinkable Billy Gates is slotted for a third day of depositions on Wednesday, because he was apparently so "argumentative" that the DoJ was unable to get all of their questions answered last week. Or is the government simply getting desperate to dig up some solid evidence of wrongdoing, with the big trial looming only a few weeks away?

That's right-- the blockbuster season premiere of "Redmond Justice" is currently scheduled for September 23rd. Assuming that the DoJ is able to prevent the case from being dismissed outright, we should have some pretty juicy courtroom drama brewing for the new fall season. Of course, if the case is dismissed, it means a premature cancellation of such a promising new show...

 
SceneLink (983)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far

 

The above scene was taken from the 9/1/98 episode:

September 1, 1998: The truth is out there-- Apple Computer is being run entirely by a huge Applescript, and they're not alone. Meanwhile, Bill Gates may not have been quite vague enough during his deposition, and the government uses his own words against him...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 982: Automation Gone Awry (9/1/98)   Yet another Stevenote address has come and gone, and by now we're sure you've heard that there were few surprises in store for the Seybold audience. We now have the official word that the PowerBook G3 line is being revamped with standard 14.1" screens, but there was no new information about the consumer portable...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1287 votes)
Apple store at Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).