Posing 'Pod Possibilities (7/12/02)
SceneLink
 

The keynote is now just five days away, and speculation about what announcements might grace Steve's agenda continues to mount-- despite the ever-harshening consequences Apple doles out to punish those guilty of the heinous crime of Unsanctioned Pondering. Most recently, some hardened thoughtcriminals have raised an interesting possibility: that one of next Wednesday's biggest announcements may, in fact, be small enough to fit in the palm of your hand. With the prospect of faster Power Macs next week looking ever dimmer, some have turned their attention to potential keynote revelations of a more 'Podular persuasion.

When the original 5 GB iPod first surfaced, did you scoff at the supposed wonder of being able to carry a mere "thousand songs" in your pocket? When the 10 GB model was introduced, did the prospect of toting even two thousand tunes in your trousers raise in you nothing more than an impatient sigh and a roll of the eyes? For the past six months or so, have you occasionally been heard to mutter "if they expect me to shell out half a grand for a portable digital music player, that thing better sure as shootin' let me stuff no fewer than four thousand of my fave raves into my jeans, by cracky" to yourself as you went about your morning ablutions? Well, good news, Mr. or Ms. Hard-To-Please (of the Rhode Island Hard-To-Pleases): Think Secret has selflessly obliterated its chances of ever scoring an Expo press pass ever again for all eternity by spilling the beans about next week's alleged new 'Pod.

And yes, apparently it'll hold four thousand songs, thanks to its 20 GB hard disk. Nobody who's been paying attention will find this notion particularly startling, since a 20 GB iPod has always been a matter of "when," not "if"-- but the "when" is allegedly next week, and that's just fine by us. Even more exciting is the price, which Think Secret pegs at $499-- in other words, the cost of a 10 GB iPod today might get you a 20 GB model next week. Meanwhile, the 10 GB unit slides down to the $399 price point, and the lowly 5 GB model goes poink. Vague rumors of a revamped look and/or interface and Bluetooth support are swirling, but it's all too sketchy for us to take seriously. The report that iTunes 3 will accompany the iPod upgrade, however, is music to our ears.

But what of the buzz, loudest at SlapTech, that iTunes 3 will include Windows compatibility, thus officially opening up the iPod to the Dark Side of the Force? Assuming it's true (and we're not yet totally convinced that it is), we're slightly torn on the issue. We certainly like the idea of Apple selling more iPods-- you gotta love some extra money in the till. And getting Windows users to fall in love with their iPods may foster a real appreciation of the elegance of Apple design, and therefore might get those users considering a switch to the Mac when it comes time to upgrade the ol' Wintel. Of course, the flip side of the coin is that adding native Windows compatibility to the iPod removes one of the distinct advantages of Mac ownership; after all, we have met people who bought new Macs solely to use an iPod. It's a tough call.

About all we can say for sure is that if Uncle Steve does announce iTunes 3 for Windows on Wednesday, we bet the screams originating from Mediafour's headquarters will be heard up to three counties away. Perk up those ears!


 
SceneLink (3733)
And Now For A Word From Our Sponsors
 

From the writer/creator of AtAT, a Pandemic Dad Joke taken WAYYYYYY too far


 

The above scene was taken from the 7/12/02 episode:

July 12, 2002: 2002 has been slow as far as Apple retail grand openings are concerned, but things look like they're about to pick up big time. Meanwhile, the grapevine hints at a 20 GB iPod preparing to surface next week (with possible Windows compatibility), and Nielsen//Netratings tells us what we all already knew: Mac users are better than Wintel users...

Other scenes from that episode:

  • 3732: The End Of The Retail Coma (7/12/02)   You know, maybe it's just us, but from our perspective, 2002 has been a real stinkin' dud as far as retail excitement is concerned. Last year, you may recall, was a veritable whirlwind of frantic store openings and the accompanying gala celebratory events; Apple managed to chew through twenty-seven grand openings, and the whole dizzying thrill ride didn't even start until May...

  • 3734: Stats Restating The Obvious (7/12/02)   Wow, what better way to kick off the weekend than with a quick self-congratulatory ego-massage? Faithful viewer Peter Cook zapped us a CNET article which reveals that Nielsen//NetRatings has discovered some interesting differences between us Mac fans and our Wintel-using counterparts: apparently we're just much better people than they are...

Or view the entire episode as originally broadcast...

Vote Early, Vote Often!
Why did you tune in to this '90s relic of a soap opera?
Nostalgia is the next best thing to feeling alive
My name is Rip Van Winkle and I just woke up; what did I miss?
I'm trying to pretend the last 20 years never happened
I mean, if it worked for Friends, why not?
I came here looking for a receptacle in which to place the cremated remains of my deceased Java applets (think about it)

(1237 votes)

As an Amazon Associate, AtAT earns from qualifying purchases

DISCLAIMER: AtAT was not a news site any more than Inside Edition was a "real" news show. We made Dawson's Creek look like 60 Minutes. We engaged in rampant guesswork, wild speculation, and pure fabrication for the entertainment of our viewers. Sure, everything here was "inspired by actual events," but so was Amityville II: The Possession. So lighten up.

Site best viewed with a sense of humor. AtAT is not responsible for lost or stolen articles. Keep hands inside car at all times. The drinking of beverages while watching AtAT is strongly discouraged; AtAT is not responsible for damage, discomfort, or staining caused by spit-takes or "nosers."

Everything you see here that isn't attributed to other parties is copyright ©,1997-2024 J. Miller and may not be reproduced or rebroadcast without his explicit consent (or possibly the express written consent of Major League Baseball, but we doubt it).